From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25115: 26.0.50; ibuffer fails to show confirmation buffer when there are side windows Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 07:45:14 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <921d3030-33fa-b1df-1fa9-d2a3e9b1c56b@gmail.com> <584517C7.8040604@gmx.at> <58453E86.3060206@gmx.at> <87shq25s7j.fsf@udel.edu> <584594B6.4010400@gmx.at> <87bmwp5pge.fsf@gmail.com> <5846CB0F.5010907@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323329-1964627426-1481064317=:1921" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481064376 26775 195.159.176.226 (6 Dec 2016 22:46:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 22:46:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: Mark Oteiza , 25115@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha , Liu Hui To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 23:46:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEOV0-00064p-86 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 23:46:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35354 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEOV3-0004gI-QQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:46:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51175) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEOUw-0004fJ-57 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:46:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEOUt-0003bz-1x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:46:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEOUs-0003bv-UR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEOUs-0005Fr-Jn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25115.148106432620153 (code B ref 25115); Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2016 22:45:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58563 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEOUI-0005Ez-5Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:45:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:36677) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEOUG-0005Em-2K for 25115@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:45:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f195.google.com with SMTP id c4so19324235pfb.3 for <25115@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 14:45:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=iVbMH+lfTBnfp9Yzm+pIFc7EeWrrnME6yQHmzMPO+FA=; b=VgWc58xzzSbemRZXJzWgFukD81igL4mMrfLHWt9n0oEae5WTHcMgSm6GvKJc9H709p OWPnuB6uM2/LLrU7vrNVUxScga7lJEWCBuvmN6s8x06ygCPjD/diICrU27BFyFhP690P KOUnF8JsV09HCZdimBznqG38ma8+DAp9DLJdhQt8qDcEip59eDzxp+tTGUVZAh894Ije GfDUKP+JsTTFjPhhpcwayRk75ruYw4Mawzw4x2FRxk5iQqJh+JmVX+Ac5evyd0ILHntH ChUzSHSTPm24fpdm2kJ1h5W8dj7OIPm9zgzIVJBzlx4VFCqIORqm0srExHCZBm7+xNZe 1O8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=iVbMH+lfTBnfp9Yzm+pIFc7EeWrrnME6yQHmzMPO+FA=; b=Ks0KDRpyEF4QA1UhbuzFSCa7hjTYq+HLuiL3xAKzsbfFy0GqzfoNZ04I+bjEBdJ3Ik ohpnbrgy779f1gQhQySmKwZydwMHvJrAiaX49CG1b/OgMeMSLt48R0ViR3kxP/TAOag1 7CuSwA4FAYyUyVjPubUC/HMdz4KyNsYx4KcYF0L+HIvNYG3paXMMM5rbHhY5dWZ2salv bUr+EVhC2+F8AZz22TqVhFYAwKnhUuoXj06IPyxXlcmKs5Af5xeEBIk9V0jzNmBKGH4O XAklO8EoMBhvKyDiIAoFBE3fiUQ48EyqlVJ473jAsn55oyuTJ80Do+p9k6A8NfbNzQLC dpvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03dJLboUl2Q8aDtTb3lezl5bid0v5VwwKyK4FUzR3NevAD6xjpWoo6kP7umXxTAVw== X-Received: by 10.98.160.29 with SMTP id r29mr66296735pfe.103.1481064318036; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 14:45:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (pl676.nas813.p-iwate.nttpc.ne.jp. [124.154.237.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm37225220pfe.15.2016.12.06.14.45.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Dec 2016 14:45:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <5846CB0F.5010907@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126573 Archived-At: --8323329-1964627426-1481064317=:1921 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, martin rudalics wrote: >> Your patch has perfect sense to me. Indeed i wrote an almost identical >> fix but you were faster than me. > > Damn. Next time I'll wait a day or two :-( > > But we still don't know what this ‘window-list’ stuff is all about. I'd > rather have asked ‘walk-window-tree-1’ on the main window to return the > last window it sees, but consider the following emacs -Q scenario: > > C-x 2 > C-x o > M-x ibuffer > m > m > D > > The confirmation buffer appears above the ibuffer buffer. I doubt that > such behavior is intentional but since I'm no ibuffer user ... I think it shows the author preference for, if possible, display *Ibuffer confirmation* in other window that the one showing Ibuffer. If the current frame just has a window showing Ibuffer, then *Ibuffer confirmation* is shown in that same window: emacs -Q M-x ibuffer RET d d x emacs -Q C-x b test RET M-x ibuffer RET H M-x other-frame RET d d x If we cannot show *Ibuffer confirmation* in the side window, because it's not allow to split it, it's more useful to chose another window, i.e., to follow your patch, instead of signal an error. Tino --8323329-1964627426-1481064317=:1921--