From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement letrec without backquote? Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 20:24:28 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <878tszkuvf.fsf@gmail.com> <87oa1uw7l7.fsf@linux-m68k.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478345111 16834 195.159.176.226 (5 Nov 2016 11:25:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 11:25:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: John Wiegley , Emacs developers , Tino Calancha To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 05 12:25:07 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c2z5U-0000LH-Hw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 12:24:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45444 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2z5X-0000za-9d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 07:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2z5Q-0000z6-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 07:24:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2z5N-0003iu-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 07:24:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]:36762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2z5N-0003i4-13 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 07:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id 189so66346107pfz.3 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:24:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=5uXl2y+7uHm8SmG4ipTfvqqGM9L49qyoZk901AIzsV8=; b=NjtRFaiHPNbCnq5B2jMj5yeto8a5wO2mH5HTnVXg4XHcwbVxfsHDns9nWcgpVXK9yQ d7MIZz0b0IsTeSugDExSrMqbKSrFjNyVxAA2ER8x99E8l6nXUFs4gJwIru4NsdnRH341 7Ngf03UDpdC2N29QQV8OauC2rk5VPQuHZGfxAPHS0x4jA9yEb7JlOauqI99fPbjHECRw 32zGPIQcyp42uNMWoTKriF/LdP/S7HDCMx9uv5//ucB61fZGIq23Wk7uV0rY2fPaJYTF G6JVty1y15UJxbXaxhC6NLkB4nN1m25Cry/LURkmSGFyKbqFMvGUfaNBgcIdparpAAXA nxcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=5uXl2y+7uHm8SmG4ipTfvqqGM9L49qyoZk901AIzsV8=; b=NIYVtvtwkjLWupkWzwpFOdx5c7LGgG9FkN9Y8hKlJnwmLIjpBdky009pCzRyBCHJ5w 8bCWbHv161EtgMZlbRAwheC0OCK+wE7wyayyLHt4JzVtQyj9wzJMwkFaswhjkqpboV4U PBe256sc9snFkfaOVTAhlUdLBocDIR+vIwTXVugotO7S0zInLvCVifUdzNPofDKvY15P eIxz+Xi0EEonx52JDVjerO+z0+2GMWs85AgDlzsWB/6e85ZWif7P0C2a7YQL83ZVD6A2 vQovESAzEDlHRSk/lOONREmYgCP9aE20Nqhby2fsqDLRIOyoIgFdvKdBytpl67SHkwoC TcEw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdrCKesCub+mHAlV9JXYG4I11ZJ3UwV/LEIPDjCTrN+olmHR2mJIrTc8RCYj5RE9g== X-Received: by 10.99.55.30 with SMTP id e30mr13277970pga.75.1478345072166; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc ([210.160.37.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z9sm26962567pfd.29.2016.11.05.04.24.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:24:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <87oa1uw7l7.fsf@linux-m68k.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209181 Archived-At: On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Nov 05 2016, Tino Calancha wrote: > >> Also, i wanted to expand in just one setq call, that is, instead of >> (setq x 1) (setq y 2) ... (setq foo N) >> like this: >> (setq x 1 y 2 ... foo N) >> >> But, it seems it's doesn't bring a better efficiency. > > That's because setq is a bytecode primitive, and both variants are > compiled to the same byte code. > > Andreas. Thank you! I was quite puzzle with that behaviour.