From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add facility to collect stderr of async subprocess Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 18:15:46 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <83pp87y6iu.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw3bxz9f.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2yfx8zi.fsf@gnu.org> <83egomxog1.fsf@gnu.org> <83ego5tjgt.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftno4fr.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <55247A98.5020302@cs.ucla.edu> <83r3rvgn4e.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftja89d.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <87wphnwh2q.fsf@gmail.com> <83zimjl1zp.fsf@gnu.org> <861szv2nfv.fsf@realize.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475658983 27269 195.159.176.226 (5 Oct 2016 09:16:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:16:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Alain Schneble Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 05 11:16:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1briJ6-0005Mk-4e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 11:16:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1briJ4-000399-M1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 05:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1briIy-000390-ED for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 05:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1briIw-0001Zx-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 05:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]:34708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1briIp-0001YY-4s; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 05:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x235.google.com with SMTP id rz1so27583603pab.1; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 02:15:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=6a4I+ZfGsaczOI3NEZYiNRpEmSM8wDX889S+Wteg3Z8=; b=jfY1/VgbdcAQlgXy+wUI7qxfaOcoPImXR1jkjFyTecn87e7rx4w/xLpfjbN7vMXp7R wasW9Zvx//4lXeSFUDjz9tJQ/Zrd5U98MHd9tuYRzw4TRyv/flirRVYJJS1NQC/jw66j XGa2P8gk/XysMq9cAUMOamU8l4IQy/pGfhwOCyK0z38eXfnYHyaLLgsq3S4Y06iCEhf1 hTIc6B3Yr4SnUxr4w3o9LC7kCKLu7hJh5FM5CJegD4a0T3lxqbssyT5jeaVlbLQKt81U g3XuMDc9QQmIpboNgktjvbKLFMkQWoUtMhiCs82fJiB/qzhQYhCQ/zyaETypfF7JEH4l MgvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=6a4I+ZfGsaczOI3NEZYiNRpEmSM8wDX889S+Wteg3Z8=; b=hM1cfEG34OYF7UH21pynyMoLHDmg3AXo4eHnM4ymtzOdI/ifV9k0TvINHdoczrqAFd TiXEpMqAm8OG022NTikV1JL1v0YhylQfvqjWo3q3zGZS0n8fZ+WYynKrgQtBh9Ms+gdh cnUX7yV40FTq50wkeNRVtZXFBUYw7PkruXwIT5LbgH3LDdWsTitDNypcjLR6fDa1ipoD T357P8dYt5DL75Vzin3EwzUoKUkEKq3fcxEIKTdnmDDOroA4ebtRcOzNMBBfXzb0UMo4 nV4VVpQrNH0RXTndiSETwkh3/d+H4cUfNJTgLUpwfXnPff8/LiykXKl14wK3InK+hl/a sY1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkZsfjOp84ceU4YtAavJyh7z8DrlJZvu7ltBpkqGaY6ukuz/oQEGs90+AXdZZHCGA== X-Received: by 10.66.20.132 with SMTP id n4mr11521733pae.27.1475658950097; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 02:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (57.92.100.220.dy.bbexcite.jp. [220.100.92.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i62sm61390142pfg.89.2016.10.05.02.15.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Oct 2016 02:15:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <861szv2nfv.fsf@realize.ch> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207996 Archived-At: On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Alain Schneble wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> From: Tino Calancha >>> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:33:17 +0900 >>> Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com >>> >>> How about to allow direct standard-error output to a different buffer >>> in start-process as well? >> >> This proposal has a disadvantage of being confusingly similar to what >> call-process provides, except that there the cdr is a file name, not a > ^^^ > FWIW, the cAdr is the file name, I think. DESTINATION in call-process > is a list and not a single cons cell, if I read doc and code correctly. You are right. May i ask you if you prefer keep the things as they are or add this feature? Thank you.