From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ibuffer: w and B default to buffer at current line Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 21:28:47 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475497751 14247 195.159.176.226 (3 Oct 2016 12:29:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:29:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: John Wiegley , Eli Zaretskii , drew.adams@oracle.com, Emacs developers To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 03 14:29:06 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1br2Mi-0002uk-0v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 14:29:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36841 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br2Mg-0002oi-Ft for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br2Ma-0002ob-N8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:28:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br2MX-0003Td-GI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:28:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::244]:32807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br2MX-0003TG-8i; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x244.google.com with SMTP id hh10so1274702pac.0; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 05:28:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=YgVafLvuKYaWIyWoBi8e0yQDmO7aA942vtu+iLLzLZg=; b=wUwPrZkJIwEahWJX687AU0jY6S2w3J8Zeq++7vWEIIz4xqkl2Hm20tVgYXQIzaYmU+ a8U0k4hkWMAjHrx53gtiExtDiBVx+5f4U3Ll7vrsYc/IR54yL/56pefCD7xrnIHBs3JF DXfQkLYd3tGiJVW4H2xbHdcca3VFahF5avy9tDAMVHZRsQgJywfESJW43vLIa1IdNTZn chwEV66HUQo4VBihWMuQuS9sNbmAzOtVcfGzCs9/Xwo6OrGvQt71ga96HxrVVVI/Nrx3 X+zf03i3on1lJFs62/GIkitBX8uRFixWBJCtMyB4InD0TwC7CsWS//T1PABKXfO/fwfc qNSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=YgVafLvuKYaWIyWoBi8e0yQDmO7aA942vtu+iLLzLZg=; b=Un9yiTk1Vg9SgAAY8F3sy2HDPjqEivkufzFePsf0Q6OVxkbc/EUHp7yCNpfgJF2yE2 U62zEccc8yVfQr8A5q5KtvcGKTC+fSmmlsH9prC1AD+NlTpL2aoqBiW4GCSccjDnZAry sO1DH1QZE6kOqtI3jh2xVmZrj8DO2oIAvS3O4bB87SbJRmIZsX9i7bnlF9LgmkDyNZqP ccBpq54COFG6+S1+L1yCUuBcJ6bC8W+dY8lQgtIFKkL0EXAxM2e7+NJ1i9RzFYRC/4hl NGg6qjoHkWKx+NYHx5N5G5I5OnN2deSNnanAsGy50azZF81WrsTXM7rXe1/ZzfS5D4kd Y6Ow== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rm2kruhnkjwALUgB7zCVfP/dopOMJVfMVhTH6Rmtt3bDZSsLJ79KQ2n1L7vi5y8RA== X-Received: by 10.67.23.201 with SMTP id ic9mr36922722pad.143.1475497732488; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 05:28:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc ([103.5.140.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h123sm47127751pfe.87.2016.10.03.05.28.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Oct 2016 05:28:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::244 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207960 Archived-At: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Tino Calancha wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Tino Calancha wrote: > >> I have prepared to patches `D' and `W': the former follows DWIM, the later >> follows your suggestion. >> >> `D': >> * 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) >> >> `W': >> * 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) >> >> I don't have any preference for one or the other. Both provide the same >> behaviour, so i am fine to push the one that people here prefer. > > This thread became very general and interesting. I would like to > ask one particular question: > i provided 2 patches, `W' and `D'. The first, `W', address John > complaint, while `D' follows the original proposal. > As i said, i have no preference between, i just want to provide > the missing functionality. Both patches provide the same. > The question is, what patch should apply? I don't see further comments so i have chosen the patch `W', i.e., the one following John's way. I have pushed it to master branch as commit a7e9d1cc