From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ibuffer: w and B default to buffer at current line Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:08:09 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474891816 24373 195.159.176.226 (26 Sep 2016 12:10:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:10:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: John Wiegley , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers , drew.adams@oracle.com, tino.calancha@gmail.com To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 26 14:10:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1boUjK-0003pN-1y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:09:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44011 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boUjI-0002ZW-9g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 08:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boUim-0002ZO-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 08:09:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boUig-0003fr-HA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 08:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:36175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boUig-0003fj-BC; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 08:09:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id qn7so45087429pac.3; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 05:09:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=/Etx5yNjixh/ut3bHRFNiDG6085E7GRbWLU+wrlhNOc=; b=XCU9bkKoSpKc0jfon1EPLpn1Sj3naEa7QM07EFzctWDDpRIU00zkm8bZrfbk44j1Qa 2Nn6PIODB2cX8bTl/CD1tQ8VrC4TEpEmBzNDOdiTFAjOBBLqBN0w24HzeRfZydDVIOWZ mlWOyuTyyAl9mBBDad7s5EdwknlBOyNpB+u1Ds0YEz/NGeBcso+V3epUwUETayoB+ByU zg+YTkAG/A+ifIC/kt+GTESApRvXGklNt5enQGGcj8RmTv+yP6APWyHMDlwilccUcABu LbgdM1aazdUd3Cjj/HMsinHTFAvelKTAB0ebbZiaSvUjVJJbpiPWbNiM0T5hXC4cAQ+I zYxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=/Etx5yNjixh/ut3bHRFNiDG6085E7GRbWLU+wrlhNOc=; b=bS2NQeS4aFoUpGjA0hKXqCYfqn2W8gg1f3AA5+bh4cpRMlzaYDa+kmn9GaWDFbiKS3 DRYKcBF7WXRQzEaiRwAjpdqtVv3X2PiRf+/9v9VkfmzoiXmZ/xEFWoSwAgWXYn7QDWkT rw8ozTlmMPdRPgT0F0yeKgKlvXYBXOBxfYXxMLB8tvYFy/+iuwpBSM22bdP1s01bIam5 E3F4XYn9S98MhiIUWXqq4XscNt4aFauL9XopQqAY6JvT6fa6Asd691Pi3JFKxDYLNt59 r2llIed/OvGsCwtMZGd6En6Tjbj6c5BC0k7SMfjQDPARhh/p3MgqmXV6wR7cfMuqu8Gv fYSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNEIM3JCYvpdaWytnqBWbKHxoqZIFi5ksbUzx7D/Q01xMnfK23kEPoDmOeBJ5C08g== X-Received: by 10.66.54.165 with SMTP id k5mr38021282pap.75.1474891693894; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 05:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (57.92.100.220.dy.bbexcite.jp. [220.100.92.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id an11sm30799458pac.26.2016.09.26.05.08.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Sep 2016 05:08:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.47 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207811 Archived-At: On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Tino Calancha wrote: > I have prepared to patches `D' and `W': the former follows DWIM, the later > follows your suggestion. > > `D': > * 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) > > `W': > * 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > I don't have any preference for one or the other. Both provide the same > behaviour, so i am fine to push the one that people here prefer. This thread became very general and interesting. I would like to ask one particular question: i provided 2 patches, `W' and `D'. The first, `W', address John complaint, while `D' follows the original proposal. As i said, i have no preference between, i just want to provide the missing functionality. Both patches provide the same. The question is, what patch should apply? Thanks.