From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Your commit 728e4008 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:02:52 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1473681864 10966 195.159.176.226 (12 Sep 2016 12:04:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:04:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: Emacs developers To: mina86@mina86.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 12 14:04:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bjPy5-0001N7-4l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:04:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42297 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjPy3-0003kz-Al for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47539) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjPxx-0003ko-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjPxs-0006Sj-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:04:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:35437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjPxs-0006Sc-IO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f175.google.com with SMTP id i75so11746050pfa.2 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 05:03:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=j36j/sOmbCIiGVGV9gtsZBkgqD/nEZa/tlqblOGhYiw=; b=MFDXaFFg+w9i/Yv1noHbzkxczCOo03WJi2elebRkLTeiAH5WgcqhvCzEYksdMFBX0c 1PUnGIaNlt19bTEHFyLyaH8cNefL8Cn80QFsW5O+2s6QgcZqbkgIVI2HibGWSjHT7YWS Z5bCynoJ8QFN4ZrwkCErmqB7kteaQZJ6uO0e3JY94RgfhNjWJtVeoqBJ7HPe1nUvYBTy L0Dn0a1WuFofB70BZT4KBd7TjMxCwpkOS5zP8fv02IkAA1sdtmhk57Ct/ZP6xe59Jpgv SKrJUlkMByuebdqaEecGHgRPEW95qUru7cTksIvSnSKOsvSHTpNQG3i+NqdoYg+JtuL/ /tlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=j36j/sOmbCIiGVGV9gtsZBkgqD/nEZa/tlqblOGhYiw=; b=dvcfvqxPJ1Nq1yskRFbPMszTI+PISYLidnYBsDVeq705RuvWkujfwcn0Iw7iSEXmLp X2H0tJGawP5pNyGkdj5QP4S6mnQXjZ0ksIJYY7n0lvjGPgrDApfzVxmBkj/9ASsVTJiT kaZSQBIKqJy+okeMAdFjULnLULq+hkyntubA59TifZoQa+Q9oxkCpYCR+9/gWYhvP9V0 LpJkkW5xnknuI+uF/HopluoQcoy141ASfCYkC2EvyoHu28B+qsyMJYaNZONoL9RglOZC uSJmZ2rvU916rA9BW2RuB1RX40ZGWHTWz7iTpo9ix2QibSZwYa2+tjmvnGMl1HxTwAuf 83qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNcKs9+TDnS+WrR0SGh7rjdRZFFcsFbCGXoCvQ4Tc6+9egBr0St9BfORM0WRlF1yg== X-Received: by 10.98.202.135 with SMTP id y7mr33150490pfk.10.1473681775932; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 05:02:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (57.92.100.220.dy.bbexcite.jp. [220.100.92.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g28sm4783322pfj.40.2016.09.12.05.02.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 05:02:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.192.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207381 Archived-At: Dear Michal, I see you define casify_word as: static Lisp_Object casify_word; but that function is not returning a Lisp object. You may return beg or end, but your current use case of this function resembles a void one. Shouln't be defined as static Lisp_Object void; instead ? Regards, Tino