From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should fixes for Bug#23936 go also to emacs-25? Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:01:03 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <8360rzysdq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469113808 22995 80.91.229.3 (21 Jul 2016 15:10:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 21 17:10:04 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFbv-0000pV-Hk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:10:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41408 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFbu-0001Vj-Ji for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFTR-0002pZ-Mo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:01:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFTP-0002Cu-Ud for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]:35518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFTI-0002C5-KN; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:01:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id h186so5598396pfg.2; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=PsI3xxOkrXcnTVp0JV1hKPUTL59r3P0cEQebWogf2jE=; b=g133tvVw7AlfzNcmBl4Bb6VePgb2GstK1oOehp5/jJQ1V+XGCc7c3M/4pux0m+DOV4 eZRnEu10mSUOf9lfsmFK+IFgliOkFtE8UUyukZMbpzvXqN1eXl/4A1XIq7D0Uj4da+dJ JKtPTdILG0Dwi1TPtobD/FLuUJpNhaZN+mZ4ecmmz8Tm4ix1rmjnEBvoHqJU+cu7T+KS ENn3B9nvzlA+Eec+7O1CDP0/UPHLoOwUCq0RcCcYD//2QRib6jpv0oX/sgKfMNVi1upN sdGnry83Y/AD3tU6ntPLEPAtDU4TvMioJKexSVRAl3B6/04PoSXMUCc11KKyQUGSK4dS QABA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=PsI3xxOkrXcnTVp0JV1hKPUTL59r3P0cEQebWogf2jE=; b=bYi+qkbgeUHg8mSlJa8byTrue2Dc7zD1YHWBgKyQFfD2fSfg8KDaja4C8zztApClbi dtjyFD0AH5Tm1FTL3vQH2fugDoqbNijzCrey41C/uPW5csuyqTWYdsN/EymxsStwVlaK eRzUngRbJ/9v6TwDPOq9PfF6XMdvgnDJAFmPicgMKi+6BQ2CLeAvuPToHiJFQGbZ7hMb 8DHQZ+lXlg4dlj+qp/ev5JXOyiLBrrhhJSzfhC3CDRsxFmXRVArVoydUP2/cExKaKCWF gk0AubM+Aiq8nTZmKkHrZLcuzJ9nBaA6oRtNk5lS+iUCSKc+/Ti3kZR/n8i8TLKdbvHc 3YUA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKaOtOPWmi5JH81EVuu0Omyc/8MVJEikulNbejcqT0JIxhPtZPVnSbz+c/rKByCng== X-Received: by 10.98.29.201 with SMTP id d192mr67745920pfd.142.1469113267591; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc ([103.5.140.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u72sm13053415pfa.31.2016.07.21.08.01.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:01:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <8360rzysdq.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205964 Archived-At: On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Tino Calancha >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:04:06 +0900 (JST) >> >> May i ask you what is the procedure here? What branches should get the fix? > > Documentation fixes that are relevant to the behavior on emacs-25 > should be pushed to emacs-25. Thank you Eli for the answer. The doc fixes in Bug#23936 are not relevant to the behaviour on emacs-25; they seems not urgent at all. Regards, Tino