Rename output buffer of `ibuffer-do-shell-command-pipe'

Rename output buffer of `ibuffer-do-shell-command-pipe'

[Tino Calancha]

`ibuffer-do-shell-command-pipe' inserts the output in a buffer called
"* ibuffer-shell-output*".

I would prefer calling it:
"*ibuffer-shell-output*"
(without space after '*').

Or even just:
"Shell Command Output*"
as in `ibuffer-do-shell-command-file'.

What do you think?

Tino

Re: Rename output buffer of `ibuffer-do-shell-command-pipe'

[Tino Calancha]

On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Tino Calancha wrote:

>
> `ibuffer-do-shell-command-pipe' inserts the output in a buffer called
> as in `ibuffer-do-shell-command-file'.

By the way, you may notice when doing, for instance:
F1-f ibuffer-do-shell-command-pipe RET

That the button 'ibuf-ext.el' in buffer *Help* bring you
to the beginning of the source file.

Should `describe-function' be extended to show the
definition of such commands build with `define-ibuffer-op'?

Thanks,
Tino