From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26932: 25.1; Crash triggered a few times a day with network process Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:23:33 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <83bmqu7rdd.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8zl5mag.fsf@gnu.org> <831sqp5hn3.fsf@gnu.org> <83zidd4196.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmpr4z7s.fsf@gnu.org> <8337b34qnw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497389059 30557 195.159.176.226 (13 Jun 2017 21:24:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 21:24:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Cc: 26932@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 13 23:24:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKtIN-0007j7-08 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 23:24:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45323 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKtIS-0007DK-E0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:24:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKtID-000795-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKtIA-00054N-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKtIA-00054J-Hl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKtIA-0000td-DS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 21:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26932 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26932-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26932.14973890193412 (code B ref 26932); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 21:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26932) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2017 21:23:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKtHm-0000sy-TY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:23:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ceres.etla.org ([85.119.82.193]:43667) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKtHl-0000sq-Eg for 26932@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net ([2a01:4f8:201:620f::2001]) by ceres.etla.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKtH2-0006XB-A6; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:22:52 +0100 X-X-Sender: vivek@platypus.pepperfish.net In-Reply-To: <8337b34qnw.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "ceres.etla.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Hmm... all those "optimized out" variables really make it hard > figuring out which Lisp data structure causes the trouble. Do you Yeah, I've come to loathe that "optimized out" message on other projects too. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 AWL AWL: Adjusted scor X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133566 Archived-At: > Hmm... all those "optimized out" variables really make it hard > figuring out which Lisp data structure causes the trouble. Do you Yeah, I've come to loathe that "optimized out" message on other projects too. > know how to examine marked objects stored in the last_marked[] array? > There are some instructions about that in etc/DEBUG. I'll have a look.