From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jpff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22029: 25.1.50; etags/tag search seems to fail Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:19:35 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <1967-Fri27Nov2015144953+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> <875-Sat28Nov2015194220+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> <565A066B.5050707@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448742022 31154 80.91.229.3 (28 Nov 2015 20:20:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: John Wiegley , 22029-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 28 21:20:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a2lya-0003Sr-VC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:20:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33654 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2lye-0001b0-IA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2lya-0001YT-Ra for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2lyW-0007Be-03 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2lyV-0007Ba-Sr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a2lyV-0007e9-Aj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:20:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: jpff Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:20:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22029 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22029-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D22029.144874197929357 (code D ref 22029); Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:20:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22029-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2015 20:19:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a2ly6-0007dR-Ut for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:19:39 -0500 Original-Received: from west.codemist.co.uk ([217.155.197.248]:54112 helo=codemist.co.uk) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a2ly5-0007dJ-AI for 22029-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:19:37 -0500 Original-Received: from snout.codemist.co.uk ([172.16.4.42]) by codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1a2ly3-0007sE-Cj; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:19:35 +0000 In-Reply-To: <565A066B.5050707@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109388 Archived-At: ps: Bug 22026 is said to be fixed in commit a521310f9e866d0cb9ab966947ff8e13 which I cannot find in "git log" Is this a branch issue? On Sat, 28 Nov 2015, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 11/28/2015 09:42 PM, jpff wrote: >> It does not appear fixed Pulled just now, remade TAGS file just in >> case, and tried the identical test. I get > > Please do > > make clean > make bootstrap > > first. > >