From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] widen-limits c331b66: Implement buffer-widen-limits functionality Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:57:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160322022539.16038.77264@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <8737riqouj.fsf@gmail.com> <221845e0-b194-433e-bfbc-105272ae5752@default> <87twjyp21k.fsf@gmail.com> <56F242E0.7060004@online.de> <877fgtpfrw.fsf@gmail.com> <56F293E7.2000703@online.de> <87a8lpnusg.fsf@gmail.com> <56F2CEDA.6060004@online.de> <87fuvgn3md.fsf@gmail.com> <87poukha9x.fsf@gmail.com> <6363ed53-2385-4bd2-9c3a-d2f41bfec4ff@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458827886 25256 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2016 13:58:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_R=c3=b6hler?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams , Vitalie Spinu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 24 14:58:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aj5lw-0000Nc-0A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:58:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj5lv-0007GG-LM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj5lf-0007G7-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:57:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj5lb-0007aV-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:57:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]:36252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj5lb-0007aB-7f; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:57:39 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u125so13587443wmg.1; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 06:57:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6g2zG+BJnYQ0CeGFcsyEx1MSU9y9EHI+X5nJzzHDJfo=; b=gobRH8JhPucQFv7b/AVH8CUnSBogtscdpbaYEnJFXLQiEgIU9L/uc1cyBDWS1wEtem +xO4F0Sz47pGlrca7ZbW4e7FZcZR2aehvbxackuh0H85Sc8FB2uetTw0yx7JSMoiaeUP +W6tF9N0j77Xkmxh5/dFZPw3ogCXnMtebJl9NbkbfRuBQ35Sc9GZZzsvy5+L4LfDDHue kosN770TkhIqns1su1XignkIeQs+W5//XcbTlLsPkvdR5+Q4w+bVexnl0S5WbpY2Qv+t 6hyMmxYiLmUyJFps3FsluP/PtCgBqIc4ySk4opXWwBwB8qSuZ8oRBCyQwYKvVsotnJnz aORA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6g2zG+BJnYQ0CeGFcsyEx1MSU9y9EHI+X5nJzzHDJfo=; b=kIHRjZFPcA5PSniSXQ4/4SGIDSK1BepzW45rPmUmgZ2M/fyk2AcDv6sq8+x7Q5kcYX tBM0aC3Eu1Dikz/COIltfMULZc2A1nBFKa42ry9DJd5gucTCkfnRe9AvcDyN66G1zgYn fy8RrKqFm+JoSqRueJbkIMSXEVnMXcH/cOHTqJiEQpxac2QMcj/tHilgXwhO/hpszt+u /+kfJha7x02vfn5n30NImxK51/eVuMm8ptQ3wdFGmPQemejy/qwJbQR2ROJzwao6uu7S kYHOm8vA7dOigXSBROSPmbUWd/w2Kva3+x8shorVApY6L0q/+UgVeaWbK9H9KqXY4YP2 pJMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKf0ooq61mRPdILq0u5R1/Dvek1ixwvnsegcAk2UZ/pVZQrkMPDALqeSs3JDWbkBw== X-Received: by 10.195.12.42 with SMTP id en10mr10005354wjd.13.1458827858161; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 06:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] ([212.50.99.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m6sm7513459wje.21.2016.03.24.06.57.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 06:57:37 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <6363ed53-2385-4bd2-9c3a-d2f41bfec4ff@default> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202170 Archived-At: On 03/24/2016 03:53 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > One could argue that the surprise is your fault. ;-) You asked > to widen to the full buffer, and that's what you got. Presumably, > if you ask for that then you want the whole buffer (whatever that > might be), and in this context presumably you know what that whole > buffer is (an Info file). If not, you shouldn't be using `C-x n w'. Just how, then, should a user undo the result of narrow-to-region, which is a user-level operation? Even if it's one that's disabled by default.