From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: code completion Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:40:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <63pnmnF269411U1@mid.dfncis.de> <87ejafwwir.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205358126 14874 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2008 21:42:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:42:06 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 22:42:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZYiV-0002md-Nb for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:42:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZYhx-0005Rm-3S for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZYgO-0004h9-2u for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZYgN-0004gT-9T for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:40:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZYgN-0004gC-3o for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:40:19 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZYgN-0004oy-8E for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:40:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZYgH-0008NW-Hh for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:40:13 +0000 Original-Received: from 112.red-81-38-8.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([81.38.8.112]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:40:13 +0000 Original-Received: from ofv by 112.red-81-38-8.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:40:13 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 112.red-81-38-8.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bjpYZ1w5eHmydbhY4xOyEwPh3JY= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:52320 Archived-At: Pascal Bourguignon writes: >>> 1) Parsing speed -- Parsing in elisp is sloooow for large files. Maybe we >>> need a real semantic-parser written in C or some other fast language. >> >> This looks like a good candidate: >> >> http://www.gccxml.org/ > > Will parsing of xml be faster in elisp than parsing C? Last time I checked, gccxml didn't need a full XML parser. Anyways, parsing XML is faster and *simpler* than parsing C++ (and parsing gccxml output may be faster and simpler than parsing C too). -- Oscar