From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chming Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The latest lisp/faces.el changes seem to break color-themes again Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:54:50 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87skqxw20c.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <87abd4vfyb.fsf@grepfind.mwolson.org> <87tzbcfqfe.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87ljwouzln.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87ej2ggt9y.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <48F7C669.7080409@gmail.com> <87skqvgn08.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224266124 18659 80.91.229.12 (17 Oct 2008 17:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Olson , "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , Vivek Dasmohapatra , "Richard M. Stallman" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Chong Yidong" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 17 19:56:24 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KqtYg-0005lK-Jb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:56:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55975 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KqtXb-00030u-JP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:55:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KqtXK-0002rP-RZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KqtXK-0002qO-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40498 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KqtXJ-0002qE-T1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.185]:50826) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KqtXJ-0000Wh-Aq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so694691fkq.10 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:54:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jAxFpxDfoiGGDNzc+A6pm7GO9QMCX/j8o15eNgNmiG8=; b=K0QpcRjrodL5uWUUR3G3GPq9R2r2EAY4ai++lSP4f97o/9UtK8Dyod/VcjgOKfOHSx Se4IzXzIhugEtWD89YDFtqVRE9biGeij8eUOXgb880jYhcEHst78mlWtO1zHuQTn2MvS EqE91qmJa0bMgCa64W0F4W6ka5hf9UiYNrI+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=wGr9nC7/kM9XrOv/oxSqrAeC4z6+WJW244L/FNNLyl8BSMedo1RpcB5zAOfaV05CV0 ZDqgIO8Jp12HTdBuMPlSKNUMzQSrN65vrYG/evf4X0f85ZWjm7Frd5fEhiXRmseoOZIo XmreaTqZyM36IUDOCzdOACYYfZi8qBbUNpEQw= Original-Received: by 10.187.219.6 with SMTP id w6mr623612faq.29.1224266091216; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.187.173.4 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:54:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87skqvgn08.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104576 Archived-At: It works now on my side with multi-tty and emacsclient. Thanks and regards, Max On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Chong Yidong wrote: > I've checked in a fix that should remove the error in face definitions. > Does it work as expected now? >