From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg?= Bornemann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68570: 29.1; recompile might not re-use project-compile's buffer Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:15:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <920b0c20-c6ee-4b41-84ec-5adfa06c64a2@jbornemann.de> <320b09d1-2af4-4110-bdf3-94da122f3dd6@gutov.dev> <86il3m1zi7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <60842df3-8a64-4bde-b6d6-f94b9a964a17@gutov.dev> <86fryp7ubp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871a3ea4-46d9-419e-a375-1d32968ccc88@jbornemann.de> <867ck0leif.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <0598898e-8e25-43b1-92c0-4596ad242ec8@gutov.dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9417"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: 68570@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov , Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 23 15:47:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rSI3c-0002Gc-4k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:47:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSI3H-00067X-39; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:46:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSI3F-00067P-If for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSI3F-0004zf-AK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSI3J-0000E0-Lu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg?= Bornemann Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68570 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68570-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68570.1706021174807 (code B ref 68570); Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68570) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2024 14:46:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSI2U-0000Cs-OH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:46:14 -0500 Original-Received: from ms-10.1blu.de ([178.254.4.101]:58244) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSGcx-000621-TZ for 68570@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:15:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.220.2.194] (helo=[10.9.78.72]) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1rSGcr-00BCsg-8p; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:15:37 +0100 Content-Language: en-US, de-DE In-Reply-To: <0598898e-8e25-43b1-92c0-4596ad242ec8@gutov.dev> X-Con-Id: 36794 X-Con-U: 0-foss X-Originating-IP: 62.220.2.194 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:46:09 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278740 Archived-At: On 1/23/24 13:21, Dmitry Gutov wrote: >> The patch that I proposed above is intended only for >> recompiling from a compilation buffer.  It sets >> `compilation-buffer-name-function' in the compilation buffer. > > I think it behaves correctly inside the compilation buffer already? At > least it did when I tested. Yes. I can confirm that pressing g in a compilation buffer that's named by project-compilation-name-buffer-function is already working correctly. After reading Pengji's security concern (thanks Dmitry for pointing me to it) I also think that it would be more favorable to let recompile re-use a compilation buffer. That would indeed make project-recompile superfluous.