bug#35564: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Tweak dired-do-shell-command warning about "wildcard" characters

[Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>]

>  >> But I'm afraid we'll have to stick to what we have now.
>  >
>  > Why?  Not sure what you mean.
> 
> I mean that it won't be easy to convince others that we need a new
> face for propertizing prompts.

Why assume that?  Who needs to be convinced?

If we can't have a new face for this then I'd like
to see non-minibuffer prompting have no face at all,
by default.

>  > I would prefer that the two be separated.  Tooltip text
>  > is quite different from prompts in use cases and behavior.
> 
> They are similar in the following aspect: Both prompts and tooltips
> are often displayed using toolkit functions.

That sounds like an implementation thing, not a user-level thing.

And as I said, `x-show-tooltip' has no problem with
showing propertized text.

> GTK tooltips are by
> default not propertized because the system doesn't accept any face
> properties for them.  If Emacs used balloon tooltips on Windows,
> propertizing them would not be possible either.  And both 'y-or-n-p'
> and 'yes-or-no-p', when implemented via dialog popups, don't adopt our
> text properties either.

Oh, so `x-show-tooltip' only supports properties on
some platforms (e.g. MS Windows)?  If so, that's
unfortunate.

Yes, I don't expect window-dialogs to respect
propertized text.  Again, unfortunate - but livable.

> The question is now whether an application should accept the uniform
> appearance of such objects as prescribed by the toolkit used and as
> such obey the toolkit's look-and-feel or insist to use its own
> implementations.  Emacs leaves that choice to its users.  Which means
> that users are told things like "if you want this mode to behave as
> intended, you have to customize variables like 'use-dialog-box' or
> 'x-gtk-use-system-tooltips'".  Nothing bad with that, but some users
> might be uncertain whether they should agree.  In particular when such
> an option affects all sorts of tooltips or prompts.

Got it; thx.

I would like to see Emacs allow, when possible, Emacsy
things as much as possible.  But I can understand that
there can be some tradeoffs.