From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68081: 30.0.50; derived-mode and display-buffer-alist Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:21:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83r0j6774p.fsf@gnu.org> <342c493e-b0ba-40a8-8023-58a9bb04abd6@gmx.at> <83v88h5j7z.fsf@gnu.org> <9fc1e566-d99e-479a-bb38-fce6a964dfc0@gmx.at> <83edf43soc.fsf@gnu.org> <9cfb6641-9fda-4623-8623-a17341369c18@gmx.at> <8db30606-c98c-4078-a448-6ad31bd59768@gmx.at> <83plyl1c47.fsf@gnu.org> <8334vezh4d.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: martin rudalics Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17955"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: germanp82@hotmail.com, 68081@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 04 11:22:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rLKrk-0004Os-AV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 11:22:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLKrQ-0001ZD-6O; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:22:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLKrO-0001Yw-RV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:21:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLKrO-0007xE-J4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:21:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLKrS-0002j3-5A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 10:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68081 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68081-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68081.170436371210453 (code B ref 68081); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 10:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68081) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2024 10:21:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLKrI-0002iW-2j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:21:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:41079) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLKrG-0002iK-36 for 68081@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:21:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.at; s=s31663417; t=1704363699; x=1704968499; i=rudalics@gmx.at; bh=iOzY+Bf5aQr8xvjDqKItr7OQy5t8YJ/sDbLjWETX6Kc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To; b=W04LJYIs8j0A7nXvRLDc+KVxxLGx7XR1KiMLLEG/ni9mKL28BlVRspRJl63+eBIq 043xQjIelIbQc0VVLsBtokvJx9vTyhN+lq+43BNqUnxltx829P/Hb3JJLxputp927 Bf9nyQmFSIM0IjM8wcSeu6DxYwXyQP78f7myMSPovnqbul7usS3vhNqbX/mdFOavb SBIfveAhcvBhVHiNJ+zr+VOuTDqtW0o4YQW3UyKqsC1C4RSrF/1+OfD3cmH7NFXm1 wDNXqSNj7IDzeFbejKo19R58iz2tAe1zk5PNAJdHnc2tdn55G0M7VxsY4p7T12OQj oSF8R/kUMZ7yekZ3CQ== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from [192.168.31.113] ([213.142.96.252]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MhD6g-1qh45J23da-00eK2b; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 11:21:39 +0100 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <8334vezh4d.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:SL+Dk5Axf5+KWE/KFwb4xpF3pMcUuNBv0nyJ6ZdyXR/M39XQGG8 YG22NQGEYD0qYVbxPHBvfHWV+nAn0HG2s3UN4w0iU5UxImatAVbzeZSWOPsU+Z585+K0aR/ gPWpwXlwKb7Vsom8t660NjCQ4kwRGDRkHbBJnHpO/krL1CD27/3RlOpKgOLDod7F05W6qx+ W0vVvgeGM4jzqEaR5x8/g== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:LRIzvcc1+fM=;DKNaWPejNupLtBLQuuLxwkNbtTh 7ByA3aCRewOsoyDQLE/Bq5hrW+lYAOY1zWihu5lyXkdQwDhqLbPY7DooG4C0vqE6CvaR57wcq 0GSWxw1XKor3mXy4B8hfulnLdZyWTHjpCengMzsT//5zz8UCQdgJH3I/bO1IfLYFzgf3akXsi Q9WlYgo0XxpwI5zCJwWx6xq6GEe20jNGPF2Oto71tcOsR3BFRt4relS03hCdB3A0ILWJzVMQa 0F6uSm90ajfie9tKUY/ateZkpPhhHgXSZcTgOv4X1L4izAU6osokX6GekcLgjTICxwzZDtrEr 26se6fm3l08O61QzsfybFRDC1NBj/qd471YambMbb/AZwTXoz1WzqUOXOSHj1rCgpCEu8fMrt 573QTzcJNx+FigRZBI278bjV2inDwYhTwDhdX1Dfd/zGL5FDnCKa7/Yz3vydvEtYAemEpQJCc dJ0Q1AUQb/AKzO2g2NfD45BHnmwGUsRnEu/p6gkWnZyiOzR2cOLnhTbzb2fG8tdFlwnr/WKDL wshSgIRW7E9Iu8erLZPRe5/yatbMh4kqyGfUW38Gd/V9aYFujWe38WiGn5X1NNdglfaJmkzeb QuYBjXc3fyBHyYD0pff6VnbFpA5xHJsD7M6sU3h91tTy9JaXWyo0wqKY6t+LrMCxocknFlsE+ Ki7vY9R49vSvseRrDbobWyTWbhqofFVJ2WZF7OOxODnmkNSHma3EI3haJYspnmUhChfyPnmXi uEUCre6trchg4YLXsEoSC68gE4qflfF2ZaF3GovLPAi+1wT7XjdOi/OuTEHtDiOnXo1T0wwE X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277302 Archived-At: > Thanks. This is a significant change, so probably not suitable for > the release branch. Do you think the simple change of using the old > > (if (get-buffer "*info*") > (pop-to-buffer "*info*") > (Info-directory)))) > > is okay for installing on the release branch, Where would we do that? The context for that snippet has vanished long ago and we need a buffer we can pass to 'info-setup'. > or would you recommend > to leave the release branch without a fix and only fix this on master? Only fix this on master. The warning for 'buffer-match-p' would be needed for both - release branch and master - anyway. Who knows how many cases similar to this we have. martin