From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ams@kemisten.nu (Alfred M. Szmidt) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) Date: 21 Apr 2002 19:54:21 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019411843 7174 127.0.0.1 (21 Apr 2002 17:57:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Toomim , Eli Zaretskii , bradym@balestra.org, xemacs-design@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zLaV-0001rb-00 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:57:23 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16zLap-0004KR-00 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:57:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zLaI-0001xG-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: from lgh163a.kemisten.nu ([212.32.172.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zLXl-0001sA-00 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:54:33 -0400 Original-Received: from ams by lgh163a.kemisten.nu with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16zLXZ-0002rh-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:54:21 +0200 Original-To: Terje Bless In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2952 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2952 * Terje Bless writes: > I do not (not not not!) suggest dumbing down XEmacs! I'm suggesting > _smarting_ it up! That is, provide more friendly and helpfull > features for those that need them while staying out of the way of > those that do not. Then why change the terminology? The user gets smarter by reading, like say reading the Glossary in the Emacs manual. That way this person who is new to Emacs will learn things, and become smarter in the process. -- Alfred M. Szmidt