From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Easy way to make Emacs look more "modern" Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 00:51:34 +0300 Message-ID: References: <492f0b5a-798e-e9d0-9921-1d9b0ad49c12@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8719"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 To: Daniele Nicolodi , Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 09 23:53:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJ14-00024d-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 23:53:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59190 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJ13-0003sx-EL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 17:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndIzj-0003BA-IF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 17:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::332]:37478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndIzh-0005ka-V0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 17:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id h126-20020a1c2184000000b0038eb17fb7d6so1185508wmh.2 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 14:51:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AzlFOWg0Z3v3dTHo4bRETXZx1UPm44s4KRCAhB14JBQ=; b=iCKycSbwPOwA0H/PmzX11/N9duJzPm91rrpmHVYtXWkpP7fnjAwY4KYGdp2OZpCwmK turyuFFP8dMTIwtzSRX48YtVegZV6DWXeEfCIcNPKqoFKDeEmDYVX5JhOWsRbF/UjTrj Wqb52WM6EcmgX0p51P4GWKAAXBYoJsO/ALmGAZ431xWlhV2GbX9bkqTuKryAJDWUgq49 kl9dLiiI3CNXBAXZ22X+06pxqZHHqM1hMqUkiWkFrCikE2ycVQDrqtCS3eIZuwP7GFIN il9YJ5SLsdF8wUrYZ/FM2jKD3Jpjkp+qakTWmcu8+LoLvyjSnpIECpxABgYydg+esumo bzcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AzlFOWg0Z3v3dTHo4bRETXZx1UPm44s4KRCAhB14JBQ=; b=YWdtZ/jxcozBU+auesXeVFK4J0rA9vUVZ1j/9Xg/blC1Z15s1jsPH09tz9EcENBte5 EuPvvS9kHXsDb+HXEmmwOU2wh3Ef8JeTYEN2DEG3Xz7HQ2TvmjZZuoGiCEk5l42Z0DEh dlDuhHmCZVsNKK4Wnic63SNp2OmiHvYQhHqwKKjP0svjjQk7xqNa4umwQ79I3Mj/C+9G TPgP2cLqKjlNBNtJOmIePqBl+GXH2elcfAFZcrili2/1GW9GHd32722sJquS/YD/VgaW e3YwOAY6/SKctwgqfMgZ0TKG9/yZ/sVW5ErlZ7iW5S6vHMVB2/c3OcollterODyCMcC9 t/5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ig2CF/9WoV/HPcJLTybKaGpQd1j/6PIyWhUy2iKfm24M6/Lqv UrMHctZHGgIqLHUonvNm3mI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoG/Pcrx/vdoZVxG7FikianoSBM8JnZTYkJHGDbfgZ+gyzZEGG783uiyVdKSsJUln5OEwQ5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4fc4:b0:38c:d622:f445 with SMTP id o4-20020a05600c4fc400b0038cd622f445mr22593916wmq.73.1649541097136; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 14:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f8-20020a5d64c8000000b0020784359295sm11573559wri.54.2022.04.09.14.51.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Apr 2022 14:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::332; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x332.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288065 Archived-At: On 10.04.2022 00:34, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > Note that the inactive windows get a lower contrast modeline via a > thinner font (if you use a font that support thin weights, many do not) > and a lighter foreground. Have you tried the suggestion? When the foreground is dark, lighter foreground creates higher contrast, not lower. Thinner weight does create a lower contrast. I guess the two tools are working against each other, but the color seems to have a stronger effect over here. And not the good one.