From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 6a2ee981c3: Add new functions for splitting the root window Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:26:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <166240424802.11417.12502552895310232639@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220905185728.838CEC0088A@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <86h71kseiw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87illzmjew.fsf@gnus.org> <868rmvxdvj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87bkrq5bmb.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmg69ifi.fsf@gmail.com> <87h71i3vr3.fsf@gnus.org> <864jxfghcf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sfkygokp.fsf@gnus.org> <87r10hg5u7.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87sfkve623.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <875yhre4qb.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="jzR09S0fRr" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27617"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Monnier , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Juri Linkov , Robert Pluim , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Hugo Heagren To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 13 16:30:49 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oY6w4-0006wG-Pu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:30:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oY6w3-00066o-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:30:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oY6sG-0000qH-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:26:53 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:37608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oY6sA-0006nm-Ld for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:26:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1663079201; bh=6XfrpuiLoxFjXkAF2Eq82G0cA0URDW+teXoRGRREwBU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=8h5fzWKjgKr/f7lTTbQamDfE4pomdWUr6CGLkVmTYFEAPqiqljImxNMzb0TeSN62r 4D3oRPoRzchLzD0tWhIdznyW7BUGCM0fWDPKdxpESBUceRx0OJEzb4cnu7P7By8SBa aeyAPhY32iHlNPPuXlQrbVMjep+4ca327asDlOMgKKYDkczz9JFeSImvg9WGmIszdu 01Px6REDRz1sqGvwv6bkVSyCqLny5fB9Do0VPCHc9IMsnLQTspEnR8rHNnr6tEfB/5 gmK9XqKGfRlQiQtNQ3YEgWgohXYwVUzKIMHl9HLd+HuqY0v705Elstd+J6Frsvq3zN al+eDGzSA5E4w== In-Reply-To: <875yhre4qb.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295252 Archived-At: --jzR09S0fRr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I hadn't realised until now, but split-window-{right,below} actually=20 > already have a meaning for a negative prefix argument. > Indeed. > > I don't know how we decide whether to usurp that with having it mean the= =20 > command should affect the root window. > Note that the C-x w | and C-x w - that Stefan and I (at least) use solves= =20 that problem by circumventing it (and by putting the command on a key that= =20 is related to its meaning). > > My own experience is likewise that I can't imagine ever using a prefix=20 > argument with split-window-{right,below}. > We agree on that point =F0=9F=98=83 --jzR09S0fRr--