From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit-Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making 'eq' == 'eql' in bignum branch Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:10:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <29f933ac-a6bf-8742-66a7-0a9d6d3e5a88@disroot.org> <8e0320d9-e0d0-2b57-57cc-2df4399f133c@cs.ucla.edu> <87lgaio7xd.fsf@tromey.com> <877em1cb0i.fsf@tromey.com> <765767b2-d2e5-a9a6-f724-d58ecf4847bb@cs.ucla.edu> <76081b5d-8c10-0a37-2c97-d4864c0faa80@cs.ucla.edu> <09153aed-361d-4f82-d9ac-b502314769ae@cs.ucla.edu> <83lg91dqd4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1535321585 8888 195.159.176.226 (26 Aug 2018 22:13:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 22:13:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 27 00:13:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fu3HF-00027l-5R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:12:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50556 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fu3JL-0006c7-Fh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fu3J8-0005n4-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:14:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fu3Ef-0000O9-0i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:10:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c09::233]:43408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fu3Ee-0000No-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k5-v6so5371798ybo.10 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:10:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ocx2l75cEcNe44OWyEjKTxWV82XT20TV0ZRwTUk/PG8=; b=BB7ttJzJYZ6OrjQynBI115hTS1X0CuwYrRzqYSbnUS/65yUhRti2+7p2mnpljZ0gP8 vUqHHK7U9CgZEI7TdIUEzZ3gAt8nPoesglmLBE5AONzOEwnrqrcynnl0wnalJepXTjQP c90eFwQGfaVEBlrD58YyqkTk+ylA9LzfVcpzRUURsb3y4SCjynl6WGAhpuVWYvGk1qE3 UyqSpjmaNKsLRhYY6v77qGtGmlNBiDfKr0n8nBTGcSP+rL2dhP52HBM1iNj+cgeClzly 6jzgQN8S/06kHNTpHqxHx2bS3rEdS1NpXRwcNeuM78BQuRiCTSERHCeMJdGqEhE6BJw5 m78Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ocx2l75cEcNe44OWyEjKTxWV82XT20TV0ZRwTUk/PG8=; b=pDK/LU8JWYUC07CRg4kHNR+kW+87jM3jKWMxppQna7x3naByNfRl5RDUhsnIAp6Zc6 KEsOw33xBpKIi/yPgjeIV4s1QmC1HJSBHynLTDZ6tkjCVVb5inOVhTwti7GieGoOpv3K 5LJ0dwfH9kTkbofQ/I6s5pP33ae4zEj2Xi0cf6x9kKeAOJT0dZibmOChBLK29kn20x6T M89HPTYFnvQUbUiKf1k6KLN+pp8JGr0TwakU+ZlYOavaOzV5aQ77bC/+5UL0Nr1Ntcf4 9QTG4fynjkY2aK8Efjr3NNhF2UInwGc1b9m6Z+UB+KTvbN8/WErq6ahg+BwyfIKUBtET 9blw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51ASDAiPqdAvTCRk6X7VzSsuR3ieO1gUtIpVHZJpvEKYwhUBLhS9 uBxSwbWG3S/1JRI5oQj35PxC3Y+u X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdatYbZfbt+0WtfPimeUtq/awgWZCSTp9onq2q9fVQB3TI+wQ6CPSVTyS7pssb1+fgmWNrw2cQ== X-Received: by 2002:a25:7616:: with SMTP id r22-v6mr5656691ybc.237.1535321416007; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2601:184:4180:66e7:c5a5:9df:eb4:3632? ([2601:184:4180:66e7:c5a5:9df:eb4:3632]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g205-v6sm11586466ywb.23.2018.08.26.15.10.14 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c09::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228953 Archived-At: On 2018-08-26 16:45, Richard Stallman wrote: > How about if we make min and max accept, and ignore, nil as argument? I usually use 1.0e+INF and -1.0e+INF when I need a neutral element for min and max respectively, rather than most-positive-fixnum. Is there anything wrong with that? If not, I think we don't even need to change min and max at all. Clément.