From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:43:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <837darmygd.fsf@gnu.org> <58bb8030d59733b52b8d@heytings.org> <83r18zkmd5.fsf@gnu.org> <835yq9ls7j.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11240176288f@heytings.org> <83h79tjd2f.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11f58780b580@heytings.org> <83v8y8ij39.fsf@gnu.org> <6a5bb5a08b3d764611f9@heytings.org> <6a5bb5a08b93601c5708@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27119"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 26 19:52:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCnPS-0006pf-EX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 19:52:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50994 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCnPQ-0000cw-VR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:52:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCnGz-00076c-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:42970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCnGx-00081n-38; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:44:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1643222637; bh=T5OxKyOWi62yHeDapjcYi0VdAAKwQPVZ/Fw1sb6w1L4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=bCV9+v+n7f9CPag1Y9o0pQ+uxKW0LPbP5WnfXQwvyc2nFeolmO5erH+EwG0Qw4QST lq0sdWENSWuWRyXg3lE3p5ZuDnbBQo2gUID0n5w70x4RVjioQ2QNrQh8oQgpl/D1Uq oOOnnzQP2PjYJcCloLcd28/JahrfBMwN8hpsEIp70S3npVI/w1FHjahLzyFhNwsC2f mwvIovwlCyRUJH/oa8w4oQ9LbecSBuCMZ+CnDCVFVPq1Hg3hUl5vpX8+q+eKT7Z7R8 C23vYF1GR+UvlUkq2NbYLknspfiPrzGMVMN7CCEJHvLPQXEx9c/1dBTPiDTOiiQh2S 4FnVUbzQRR46g== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285446 Archived-At: > > if your system is noisy > It's on an unloaded build machine, with just one sshd and one bash process. > > you can increase `elb-runs' to an higher value, in the results an > estimation of the error anyway is given (probably more reliable with ~ > elb-runs >= 5?). > Thanks, I'll keep that in mind! > > That said yes, is a suite of micro benchmarks but it's better than > nothing. > Of course; my remark was certainly not meant to be derogatory.