From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using Emacs in fbterm. Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:45:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83czcjvtt2.fsf@gnu.org> <835yiax4ea.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgfmvnu0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11326"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 29 21:47:41 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oSkjS-0002lv-S1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:47:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51468 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSkjR-0003lv-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSkhg-0002WA-6H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:45:48 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:44478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSkhe-0001i2-M5; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:45:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1661802345; bh=yvDEyMirBEvNN9TxApg2TarRtxdJl8/Qry765UtjR1Y=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=HUlG2SvsML3nFjMfrIwucKtM7LXdm4fvvMFemZ6wpKADgYWUoNBytRUzTKL12Nowt y72Ii7U1AvhFiHp2/Z564CNZiWwLgsmZAhBlJgFzHuzwNmieucnROhToPeQ3RV0l7F Q1ehN+JKAmbq9h6UhtB+by3huw7n2Cgpgrt+EV2C90dyirwnUOj8O+bG330eX4ujz5 802U9bvV+Q08q50IJb8n4+ymbJjbhQ2DbdSwYuCDhEnXN1PY3tK1lRWsJQpFsv5W94 /kdPM6ASVhzNDZ67nEm/INb2qR9394+ZhpFcqCezf0XDywNV4xYzfQvOG6I2u/diry UZfXAws0PtwFQ== In-Reply-To: <83zgfmvnu0.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294307 Archived-At: >>> What does the terminfo DB say about commands to set color on fbterm? >> >> Here's the comparison of the relevant entries between linux and fbterm. >> I don't know where the fbterm entries come from, they seem to be based >> on some patched version. > > Not surprisingly, the differences are in color commands. > I guess the safest fix is to add an additional note about this in the FAQ entry?