From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:55:39 +0300 Message-ID: References: <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> <1845d7aa-9ae4-3d95-6a30-c7b1d8d8adec@gmx.at> <83a73qt6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <97c4254e-ff43-8402-3645-f713c408c245@gmx.at> <83y2r9syby.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv1xsset.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="60431"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, rrandresf@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 05 20:56:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLARL-000FdY-Qe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 20:56:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50924 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLARK-00088C-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:56:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAQq-0007i0-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:55:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAQp-00083t-LZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:55:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:43734) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAQp-00082U-Dk; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:55:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id w15so8556091wrv.10; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 11:55:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bVkE9Ve0L+Xip0YOUTwxrAnCrecLzt0r6d5NORATb5c=; b=uRFwpXLUmFsnjP18wm4BrODXeWi4p3OjSKj5DtYr1xlNoWQZ77cuBSgto9ai/oG03y az3ZtJyx5DxjTF82V3MmtHrAjp5r/Ci4eUGU453PVq2GzEBM1P8GUz+7khVBEsP5dOyz m1pUvpCiIZTFPXyoKnWtb6JlwUzbPHbdQb01ZEE/ovZYg4Ie2I26EcXmoVys/VZa3Elq vhnjhjQLjhE0NrdzaOCQ2+L6kddAm9XumOoi2DpvJ9aKhOGR55cXKSFiQ3/w7XYSAe77 RDUC1Hg4rrHGCwwFGKgrOhjfX57QWNQXsdpdyX+ACv4VkMumXMIQyfGPVEv97PS7p2PC 0ulA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bVkE9Ve0L+Xip0YOUTwxrAnCrecLzt0r6d5NORATb5c=; b=t7WdL8+dahzLzkD3J67L+G1JeXoYqkPfk+Jf09BwIxdz7zwMUdAmuyTz9Taj8YMbnF X4JqFClrFKuhP+FIHyQAqP0li//t+xz7+Y92uHvI5RhYT6PJBpiulpAn4Fi2yxypmg6Z rthiqUAd93UNGfITpbedM6CDC8UVCuz4w3OyeMeC9yKMIqbPCXqWi0J2R/woz9U1f2ot rd+tQPkjsV4L++lq7ynV2s8blMvlhfUY0ILn+8pF7SbRmANRlzwDZtK6Y/qhUAVDEW9o ktzEKb8dFAVzRFnw+9ZqpbiUHSwanIeT4Dk976ms/n7wlVOz8MlVLUZUmCKzSwBEcspS dJbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuavAjCTtJUVV32LNhaokXvC3a/bZp9PxasCyilkYQMH9jFmgjM0 jBaFHdHAnn5FYhRHFfR1hwh732uy3KU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLKshoOKjFGGw4QMOthfzIwpmQzF+wR3UXHzTkPXwVuh8Wc8O0BNnYsQaqHuAkY2vFt/XzH7A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:dd86:: with SMTP id x6mr19776484wrl.169.1586112942074; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 11:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 19sm21380350wmi.32.2020.04.05.11.55.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Apr 2020 11:55:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83tv1xsset.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::42d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246479 Archived-At: On 05.04.2020 21:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > No, redisplay-dont-pause wasn't supposed to help when redisplay cannot > keep up. It is for the opposite use case: when redisplay is so slow > it slows down processing of your commands, like typing, for example. > You'd then set it to nil to speed up command processing, while giving > up correct display at all times. What's the difference between redisplay being slow and it being unable to "keep up"? I don't understand, sorry. And in this case, IIUC, jit-lock is part of redisplay. And it's slow enough for this to be noticeable.