From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37415: Asserting failure setting frame parameters to non-fixnum values in early-init.el Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:32:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83v9tqvrm7.fsf@gnu.org> <9aae1b2e-bb5f-8634-5501-9aaff9f51266@gmx.at> <83imppvl9r.fsf@gnu.org> <14d4a455-254e-fdc2-0b64-791cfb0f7724@gmx.at> <83o8zgtlvq.fsf@gnu.org> <0936d492-c2bc-d4d3-7fcf-272d0fdbe087@gmx.at> <83a7ayss4b.fsf@gnu.org> <7b896377-d546-b428-adba-797ec988c4fa@gmx.at> <83r24aqadz.fsf@gnu.org> <4495f73b-7897-3a7c-4880-14a10da30458@gmx.at> <83zhiwpa7y.fsf@gnu.org> <888d2c1b-0253-e452-93fe-e7104a259807@gmx.at> <83r248p56f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="57597"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 37415@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 23 09:33:47 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCIqv-000ErN-BZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:33:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCIqu-0005cl-4V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 03:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCIqH-0005cX-5g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 03:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCIqG-0001Ql-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 03:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCIqG-0001Qe-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 03:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCIqE-0008EB-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 03:33:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 07:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37415 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37415-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37415.156922393531554 (code B ref 37415); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 07:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37415) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 07:32:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCIpT-0008Cr-7y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 03:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:35475) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCIpR-0008Cf-NH for 37415@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 03:32:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1569223924; bh=s89OaO6VwWVWSZnLdtt/Wssq9G0WsPSOjDn+opEXCAY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=dXG3TcoNSHl1vkWTgTP/S0kd5svraxf9f2G09afCtiF+H5ubt1k0ljv/KDQcZhYe4 rKDUJL2yaNYeRkLPyALQSzx0TttV1PfWZxOdZ6Zi+bCpvx2XYQB6pkdrXPT8EgIb1n s401gi8nCeAoMUskIefWrfCG5tY8JmlRtPax+4DA= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.42]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MDhlV-1iMzWl35PT-00Aj41; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:32:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83r248p56f.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: de-AT X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:4u+Eq1EDRzD12WLwGQohvW4uiFgGViUtowXkqQfABcJxlTbTrVA 5JSazgCfBxFV8J0GDeHSFj9ebXRTOZP61oG4wUBfw9mwQERzNgcg94tvRN4t5viyOALUT4o xTbHLYiOv3D9pe9sG4mXEsMluLEk2uGte6HEKEmmqELn7S+bOu0gBk80q89RrszEMKq2p/s tZMfyHFzcGVwa5/fK7OHQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:enGdhsbehKc=:lbgiwz2nsS+mqFth2j3ig5 RVLEaOe4c9N8OV9aVbXd40lxuR15sXWr3fsgm3UN116IkDfHlSFIIaantAa5mTOAPIywAHQ/X rcajD9oTkD3WYRFXZkdW5KXKyoHu8DkXlVrE3BeV4nJNDCL6d2PEMLttVVKmc/ss7+8CnCYjM OJn0i87Q4mhEaiu7mfTC+/e7uvDZAqWHVQCYCIqHeersFbLbCTdXkOerluLT1krMg6HBzUBM3 RCCoKT/g3320tYoDu5W2fuywWbLfm9OJaMd1770Hi7fZJ8ABDq7+LJANUjt3VpKuxj9fMKf8N aXMq35E9trIUxnerm9F/n1ZSXrUYuXbH4tjOxAgf1XhwItiujFFb8vs6wp/+YYOZhgoSztX6K WIf7w3EebIX912C/fDdxNSojeGgcBOHKuAxQFgUaIEsst7ijzPZboDzwV9D/KxYSWk4OQ3Aif c7FccY9X4SLLILi3N1knRvQ5OUecXys5Z7FfIurvc+6SvA98xMPYmJ03Zc0wt4PpaNB0r3yn3 TRfn1R1dD+qt3VYrsCRPM+pHPTxKp8s6Bf5yl573WElKLDtFHm3GEHjHF6jVcE8aiiBjpl8Mq hpf6yCSa4UObrKEhoptqKYSXsjEOKfViJucjOFrT/4psrlgFukOjpBEx2lBbejiaVIgdj6HCk s1h5OCl0sZU36PvaKFgbCnlOKAmLQK7mNges/DxXQdXhiLQPgiANMMB5COPUpSZ5ZPD9ZU1TV AA4/GjyBI1mdBhXiKgYsl13GHduHpsP45cCYyxvgl8AWGxMaIm3Q+tFhbda+A+KkJ1zNtk19 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166963 Archived-At: >> >> I do hit it here. Unless some sort of bug happens before. For >> >> example, when using (left . foo). >> > >> > But not with (left . (- 0)), right? >> >> With (left . (+ 0)) but maybe not with emacs -Q. In the backtrace below >> note that it gets called from 'frame-notice-user-settings': > > I was asking about X, but the backtrace you show is from Windows. Am > I missing something? You asked . how come we don't hit this assertion when the same expression is in the init file, only in the early-init file? and the dialogue continued as above. So your question was clearly about Windows because X cannot "hit this assertion". martin