From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24353: 25.1.1: looking-back wrong info Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:57:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83lgzael08.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472809946 4760 195.159.176.226 (2 Sep 2016 09:52:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:52:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 Cc: 24353@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 02 11:52:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfl90-0000Hc-70 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:52:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41242 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfl8x-0001oe-V3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 05:52:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfl8o-0001mX-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 05:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfl8k-0003Xl-GH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 05:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfl8k-0003Xh-Dj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 05:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfl8k-0001EX-6X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 05:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 09:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24353 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24353-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24353.14728098964706 (code B ref 24353); Fri, 02 Sep 2016 09:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2016 09:51:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46987 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfl8K-0001Dq-CE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 05:51:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:65325) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfl8H-0001Dc-Oz for 24353@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 05:51:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([77.12.41.50]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue005) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MXkkl-1bcic53kzH-00Wm6b; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:51:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83lgzael08.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gX4CAqlgqON8Y553qA2usRNKtL9RpwTfMGIKCqH38XE9js8Tiyn j+njHZ7UdBU/olWfWdSh3rEDm4dwYdhWZjBwjXq3jXp7Rw6yE1BnVK5taC74pnmNmhak/XQ LUfd7eNhRoVK1E4jQhqS+FVj7mCFLl/WkobVHpNmjio9HPzRahBpwo87nVyRVNL9LoH5Pyt hwwjKSPDB3FuMpwdEzgQw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:XUF6OTKxy+E=:6spgPf1t+YRXZafkEnpI3s Z1qCGDpz0g9a3Vm5B8CnKWBJpAOvY6uMJKBPWv/3rA8AmlPdK49DqY+meNa+JlrB8lqlLgB/X XeHl3RC1NjnkS0IGAOi4/ZSEXRtFX46VFS8o726mPQWlG3gQIFW285wbIzCQ54JpkmGx2ig2I lIUoWFon4yfoYbq7CcJm1faUER3oJA/vwHNrr9+BVSEjBDOaetsyU6lMnSeQa2LtHh4CN6Vra 0UNIJMA2/ZT0AyrvasCGc6xaaRHV6U6bjcK5HyuKFZmVlcCkbw4S45dNnfi15nLkoHEL3k+B2 MuB4ZnRLD7s+1MvYcY9JEphWOPSQHCs4+6i/Z7FTFGfvjBa/lUur7h2JB406Kn/ia6LtBvKMZ bFLTYKxQYQMUjVoqeB2f8da2k1YLGyCBOWIFHV9OyVX6vy5rkmUSCTsvP9h6KYrofu/AJcWfE HJqgcoXjZdhVcvfHXEUuU4ZiHOTTaDCRrwhY4t/F189rY2wZFPkIuUeCb4+FK3K8Qz1A3xGr6 4PrR67iziVIER4ksmUf85brndc2jNXSEvIOUnGakvO3UFM+5oYs1euU5pS7RloxSQTBzeDUU9 1bXRWRsLd492yG1Dk5se1lVO4uhE1NCYt1rYKhzsXn63qpkBZzmsfKY+DCyHUUejYSncvpZ7i eV+ygotBHSlV0Y6QBId8DBC5x02Sae4WiAFmEza8LTyMeZeJrglxD2Zq8P7Q5WHUUjZp/UK96 L2d/Me2kU6I3wxLq X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122851 Archived-At: On 02.09.2016 10:58, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andreas Röhler >> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:48:39 +0200 >> >> Wrong advertised-calling-convention >> >> From subr.el: looking-back declares optional argument LIMIT mandatory. >> >> Such calling-convention deserves a place in doku, but should not send >> wrong info out of didactics > Are you saying that using advertised-calling-convention is wrong > everywhere, In the way it's implemented, seems a bad idea everywhere. It cheats the user delivering wrong resp. incomplete signatures. If certain usages are discouraged, that might be told in docstring, by re-writing the function etc. > or just in this one case? If the latter, what is special > about this function? > > Thanks.