From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36644: Git log search Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:44:58 +0300 Message-ID: References: <874l3p4lks.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87blxvj5lv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <23ad9090-ebfc-4307-b41f-30f7c310d978@yandex.ru> <87tvbliw37.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <1251461563472968@myt6-1dca55ddeee8.qloud-c.yandex.net> <87lfwvrpur.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <62a4fa22-d4f5-5cd4-69b7-7ae1c70e68bc@yandex.ru> <46b910fb-25f0-1b6e-df9b-fda1383cb1c9@yandex.ru> <83tvbbnz2d.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7d33tnk.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="180844"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 Cc: Robert Pluim , 36644@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 25 14:46:07 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqd8I-000kvl-7D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:46:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59722 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqd8H-0008OR-8w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38013) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqd8E-0008O9-UT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqd8E-0001Gj-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqd8D-0001GY-Sk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqd8D-00032m-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36644 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36644-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36644.156405870911629 (code B ref 36644); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36644) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2019 12:45:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38498 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqd7N-00031V-Ai for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:45:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com ([209.85.128.48]:40208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqd7L-00030w-Md for 36644@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id v19so44652473wmj.5 for <36644@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:45:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qSMZUa0/b5bii9CsmvZwy5g7ADesKRoKmFgjG27aoRw=; b=ZKwNaxWfQoYzz1kxj6ZwXviMaSOjjH2rTgVTL4Mq778TA34IpXIBiXv0BC46sM3a6F i1nVDtKjXI04i+jJOXp2yEjOuvhx7KaIoG+hsAcRKV8q3/0CitAwVwnTbmzdeqf+HRi6 hrNb+cAuP/N642TlGksfabujOhb5Pz32U87wypAhl0k3SKQjyBaOkJl7NF9uywRlje3g YQ1CLQNOB21XVyukeExg1FYzzAOY7zAXCK6iO8/t88hL0oFMDTDUG+aCthl/jH9M8uyo q7rq4trsgPyxuMSLXwr5IDOYeFMGw+Udg+aiWr5taKI9BkswNo4xLJsHvcwEoDycZ42T MXLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qSMZUa0/b5bii9CsmvZwy5g7ADesKRoKmFgjG27aoRw=; b=HKrw9xDqsEGQjO2cTP5XjY9MAL43sBYbUl/W0sIyjUQDCFHH1PICg5WkPkfTrwcoCz rlIwvstNVIoFheX0Q8eb9o3A6qnZ6hXtn4ooHCd4IQ9Bff9ShdlqU+n9N3ADjQ2Z6Dis JbpVcSaBxz+My3fRSABvQd4Au/IJnAMhWmM4iv+yjzTCVcv3aCXGD/7Ibf2ZdiYkvL/1 XWUvURwydq0HJZjcJnFhPrqyghP9oygVQzvHg+sw0eRvMDlwg0lHrGXdQdnN9bisI8Sn 60CD3xk9ASIot4ncrcWLTFeBYIpTVvHyMTy5n9ZEnW2p+v8zm0C0qPOpL1FQbSCIwNjw 6W3A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU9UqBDej9bHyrJM05OWwYC3qWg61H57XJYLI6lGXPCJQ1zZQpP VdVAupbs7zUvKP60kz/bIiiBccJV8WQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwd5u+9kiuqhv0qrWvN+RXvtUwe33/q8/g/yKA1oyLf3ixN9QYW9pCsOcECjIlSA6litA0DbA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e710:: with SMTP id e16mr82059570wmh.38.1564058701488; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w7sm58019515wrn.11.2019.07.25.05.44.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:45:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87a7d33tnk.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:163699 Archived-At: On 25.07.2019 2:22, Juri Linkov wrote: > So I fixed this accordingly. Thank you. Two points: - Are you sure we want to use the basic regexps here? Thinking back to my experience when I just started using Emacs, I really was only aware of two kinds: extended regexps (because most programming languages use this syntax nowadays) and Emacs regexps. So I figure extended regexps might be the more user-friendly option. - I wonder how tabs got inside the new function's definition, considering the value of indent-tabs-mode we have in .dir-locals.