From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40919: 27.0.91; next-error-select-buffer does not always behave as documented Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 02:30:27 +0300 Message-ID: References: <53913bd9-2bdc-0f70-f7b4-744283e0512f@ieee.org> <87d07rmb6j.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zhau5bfw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <66f63b16-307a-919c-1d25-60ff63f92ae6@ieee.org> <87bln8u3xq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <851cd382-4b2e-447a-2212-919c8a4ce908@ieee.org> <87d07lykkd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bln5rbah.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhaozlvo.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87v9kr8t1s.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zh9yuw5o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="94442"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cc: 40919@debbugs.gnu.org, tspiteri@ieee.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 24 01:31:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jcdbp-000OUG-Lg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 01:31:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46452 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcdbo-0002qV-Mc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 19:31:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcdbb-0002oz-SH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 19:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcdbb-0002Pz-Gf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 19:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcdba-0000WK-Dm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 19:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 23:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40919 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40919-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40919.15902766371971 (code B ref 40919); Sat, 23 May 2020 23:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40919) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2020 23:30:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcdbB-0000Vi-7Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 19:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com ([209.85.221.51]:43952) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcdb9-0000VV-9U for 40919@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 19:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id i15so13795609wrx.10 for <40919@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 May 2020 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Av3XlEm5KzPKDaLmQH9giiXZ3BoWp36LhVUs1WFjFR4=; b=Alh14oq2iXXgnNpL8ydkmmeEJVbaHYf80HM9sHRCpbECMC3F1u/UBRwzFMO0hrSY3E EoFOgtwxsrB6uFRjKdzUFO0PFUUDWv1Qj6gyXHKE0++CeJ6T+kz2bXbnUZHU32fM7znZ e6rO9ULZ+b6Or6A0tEq0Ct7brOJ3j9e1GhXDGWMKQ4tVRyVzlAIwqofpXx23Xk6zZex6 7/LtZoLaArnXALh7XiAzbpI9uc018f1lmtzv+bEy5ErmyFciHKrABO51Pzk4+2nJAVmV WmhJSHFyHGqPzW7kZbFl4yPUc2pq3Eou3UzsfaJG9KV9mwQqgHjCPRm/Rcwe7cyHaZYV cxeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Av3XlEm5KzPKDaLmQH9giiXZ3BoWp36LhVUs1WFjFR4=; b=Ynn+H3UVFXuXQdXjLfxeH4melHlZmOgbIPds+pal4LmZFGVrHSwFJeDiaVTsKCpshz MjcRkSFH65vn0R/jmhQXKSRNcmBHwY34kxxHYOhGktwdgYkyd8M7Tlu98LNbTgIKxuc0 +AYatI+PiP2bqNskXHDgUmjmK4Vl5EtqHmbXauZh0+QAF3BujG8TXDy7t4CE9+Tj6+e6 Fw1AiGVMKeFItQttRKnsqwDXKo4aderWW8sZ1FaWGZi+g2LkRZ0VcihsRckYnR0XBJQk V/evVhIpeT4C93UfXYiBm0UGOr0X4RkgVPFmKO4tiPW6+H75606hf7nI4T7tkw9U3GtW mdFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533A/2gJtutySOMcGC/Wl8utRsR/jjWBQpqdPF2ThkZAVVOAYxkg MBEyDInvh31xFnuQecw0cFI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEvmsjp5YH1oo8/I81Z3vTpOZzxb4q//xM+sUAJj56YM/xW9X5Bgop30X73U9SuMS23sV+bQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a1d3:: with SMTP id v19mr7699404wrv.245.1590276629025; Sat, 23 May 2020 16:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm5735409wrw.19.2020.05.23.16.30.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 23 May 2020 16:30:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zh9yuw5o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180868 Archived-At: On 24.05.2020 01:24, Juri Linkov wrote: > Is this patch for master? So there is enough time for thorough testing? I think it's for master. Though if we put it into emacs-27 and changed the default to the name of the new function, the behavior shouldn't change, and yet it would be easier to "fix" this bug through user configuration... (ʘ‿ʘ) But your question seems to confirm that it's for master. Suggestions for a better (shorter?) name for the new function welcome, by the way.