From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to resolve: Conflicting tags: mh-e-8.4 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:06:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <7bhamjwv8i.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zk02fgu7.fsf@olgas.newt.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358824021 30487 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2013 03:07:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 03:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bill Wohler Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 22 04:07:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TxUCf-0006Rh-1f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:07:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49509 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxUCN-0003tp-Cp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:06:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxUCK-0003tj-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:06:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxUCH-0005AV-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:06:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxUCH-0005AR-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxUCH-0006md-3W; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:06:49 -0500 X-Spook: Tony Blair IMF Bush Wired offensive information warfare X-Ran: HuUb:jN'Xz7L?"&}SInUZ\@d}gbU,#/^tk4mbv/y>Bu"O4%Ay^N{x3P5omPht^ms.u!lf" X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87zk02fgu7.fsf@olgas.newt.com> (Bill Wohler's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:58:56 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156567 Archived-At: Bill Wohler wrote: > In that email you mention that you haven't seen this with bound, > authenticated branches. This does seem like a deficiency of Bazaar in > that you have to align the planets to avoid this problem. When I push an > unbound branch with a new tag, the Right Thing Should Happen. > > Regardless, I'll make sure that I'm operating on a bound branch of trunk > next time I tag. I apologize for the trouble. It's not really that much trouble. I don't think it makes a difference whether you use a bound or unbound branch for your tagging. Whether the person at the other end has a bound or unbound branch affects whether or not they see the issue, is all (I think). IIUC, the issue can arise only if you move a tag. Ie, tag one revision, then later on tag another revision with the same tag. It's an inevitable consequence of bzr not having versioned tags. If you need to move a tag, just move it and don't worry about it though.