From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Konstantin Kharlamov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50241: flyspell doesn't work with multiple dictionaries Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 23:19:36 +0300 Message-ID: References: <581ffd00b0c4a0762689a423aff0ee13b5c85e52.camel@yandex.ru> <83lf4lmm8k.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0k5mked.fsf@gnu.org> <8658b0b457b9fc41624b454a0534013173de37ce.camel@yandex.ru> <65a1ecacc7ae808fc6fbc204094375604352c4aa.camel@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23261"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 Cc: 50241@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 22:20:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mK4oM-0005oP-Qr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 22:20:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41756 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mK4oL-00066U-Qd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mK4o6-000667-Hz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mK4o6-0004dg-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mK4o6-0007ha-3H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Konstantin Kharlamov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 20:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50241.163018199229587 (code B ref 50241); Sat, 28 Aug 2021 20:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2021 20:19:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55071 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mK4ns-0007h5-MB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:19:52 -0400 Original-Received: from forward100j.mail.yandex.net ([5.45.198.240]:54484) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mK4nn-0007gn-QO for 50241@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:19:48 -0400 Original-Received: from forward102q.mail.yandex.net (forward102q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:1ba:0:640:516:4e7d]) by forward100j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8ED0664F3342; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 23:19:37 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from vla5-396535d496ca.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla5-396535d496ca.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c18:341f:0:640:3965:35d4]) by forward102q.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8C2493A2000F; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 23:19:37 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from vla5-47b3f4751bc4.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla5-47b3f4751bc4.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c18:3508:0:640:47b3:f475]) by vla5-396535d496ca.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id JdjVSJAEp4-JbHelNTw; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 23:19:37 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1630181977; bh=jO9Lyt2Ac2NXuDdNgE0RjBLOyYd8o+X5glg7yudMWGI=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Cc; b=k6ID3eQEEF+epben3U823aE2l22OKyrbPZs/5oWK8cBL0fhqoPM673eNxs9tfWDRo i+wvozkoT6qgmTKaGEjU7HLswqq3BZQbKAC5xNt5waWWPIyYscwpkpucEQx+pKw23I yzyEo/WpS8EDlHjhLda2y6Iti1f9vmjPGCLs61XU= Authentication-Results: vla5-396535d496ca.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Original-Received: by vla5-47b3f4751bc4.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 6dLfUshaV0-JawORXFc; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 23:19:36 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) In-Reply-To: <65a1ecacc7ae808fc6fbc204094375604352c4aa.camel@yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212898 Archived-At: On Sat, 2021-08-28 at 23:02 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > On Sat, 2021-08-28 at 22:45 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > > On Sat, 2021-08-28 at 22:36 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > From: Konstantin Kharlamov > > > > Cc: 50241@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 22:05:55 +0300 > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2021-08-28 at 21:56 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > > > > > > You miss this step at the end: > > > > > > > > > >   (ispell-change-dictionary "ru_RU,en_US") > > > > > > > > > > It tells Emacs to restart Hunspell with these two dictionaries. > > > > > > > > Thank you! Running this command results in error: > > > > > > > >         (error "Undefined dictionary: ru_RU,en_US") > > > > > > Strange.  Here, it doesn't error out.  I did this: > > > > > >   M-x flyspell-mode RET > > >   M-x ispell-hunspell-add-multi-dic RET ru_RU,en_US RET > > >   M-x ispell-change-dictionary RET ru_RU,en_US RET > > > > > > And I don't get any errors, and flyspell-mode works for both Russian > > > and English. > > > > Thank you! With a little modification for steps to be: > > > >   M-x flyspell-mode RET > >   M-: (setq ispell-program-name "hunspell") > >   M-x ispell-hunspell-add-multi-dic RET ru_RU,en_US RET > >   M-x ispell-change-dictionary RET ru_RU,en_US RET > > > > this worked for me! Hmm, let me try to experiment with that a bit to see why > > it > > didn't work for me non-interactively… > > Okay, so the bug seems to be in ispell-hunspell-add-multi-dic function. When > called interactively, then the following interactive call to (ispell-change- > dictionary) has the ru_RU,en_US dictionary as a completion. However, if > ispell-hunspell-add-multi-dic was called non-interactively, the completion > from the subsequent (ispell-change-dictionary) call seems to be missing. > > Not sure though why the difference in behaviour, the "interactive" part of > that function look innocent, simply (interactive "sPrompt"). Not sure what > starting "s" means though. Okay, so, I figured there's some sort of odd cooperation between (ispell-hunspell-add-multi-dic) and (ispell-change-dictionary) going on. When the first is called non-interactively, interactive call to the second results in no completion for the new dict, right? So, the fun thing is that if you abort prompt afterwards, then you call (ispell-hunspell-add-multi-dic) again, and then you call (ispell-change-dictionary) interactively again, the prompt will have the completion. It looks as if call to (ispell-change-dictionary) initializes some important variable required by (ispell-hunspell-add-multi-dic) to function properly.