From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35702: xref revert-buffer Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 00:33:33 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87tvdzv4m2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838suw5jvh.fsf@gnu.org> <835zq059az.fsf@gnu.org> <710f0ac1-80d7-6db8-7653-c58f93b6f4ab@yandex.ru> <831s0o54g7.fsf@gnu.org> <9869e4ac-1b36-b605-22a8-b8bab4910132@yandex.ru> <83r28n4pdn.fsf@gnu.org> <2103dba2-60ec-9752-1ab8-71ed66fafe63@yandex.ru> <83h89j3rus.fsf@gnu.org> <28666899-1fcd-947b-8b2d-528f786302a9@yandex.ru> <831s0m4iz1.fsf@gnu.org> <83y32u32eb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="207973"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 Cc: 35702@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 25 23:34:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hUeIu-000rxz-Jc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 23:34:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46662 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUeIt-0007je-Kb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 17:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53193) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUeIl-0007jX-Dy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 17:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUeIk-0000d7-Ca for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 17:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUeIk-0000cp-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 17:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUeIk-0007uQ-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 17:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 21:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35702 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35702-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35702.155882002630379 (code B ref 35702); Sat, 25 May 2019 21:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2019 21:33:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUeIU-0007tt-Ed for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 17:33:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:46518) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUeIS-0007te-F2 for 35702@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 17:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id r7so13169683wrr.13 for <35702@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:33:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZU7yy/5zfMCIA2JCz6yQXP3AiG0bSCkUNk4zfoCV3wU=; b=PvALscrHBjznR2IDwotUoBq8e1joGEwrREd/2m2kp/g4fKiiseRd64TQpcRDEqUbLD tqlTBFCeD44E7+/sHptjla026/4aG/GNs6+qOJyEOjTv1bXI/vBuJtSSNzCYOZ6e3y9T WhTJJaOIGJfjksw0/ml9CiVh1PmZgXb+SJoyqiJAMGh/6bC65hgO+q1i+OQ853NNTavd UV9XrR74aAAIxMg2ycWWO0oeIQTnG2O4DE4uGCKhMRTlyy5/FO++j1rr4+sGhxDYpiwk rmKqf1sa/fagHgI0j55V8wyy/UBniGjIsbBid80hqhJ++flqYO+nIGAEdl1xKLjOdax5 06EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZU7yy/5zfMCIA2JCz6yQXP3AiG0bSCkUNk4zfoCV3wU=; b=Fw1bcOs8WKKGHMAgtkT85d+ZwTKyVfXgHqXBapSSeWiG46gFXO403TnNzoMNqf5PJI 9FPPiIfRl/Ua02lMKYoVFsSlWMAfjsC+ir2Y/R2ahVrDoQDXBbUAV9oieC4vpljfZUq8 qQgiCo8503lh34KqapknFrFl8s1hVDEJOvdXQvIelAsvbnT2Z36CmaehSwBYrxdqJXwc Kbekkflx4AMjyTZM6SaRrnjEe+IRjIFJLAi+w7YYriN0SOQCCqOEx3NSU8XS0hrPA2nf 59Fg/pjY3IzhU12ytN4VIcI0cv+KVSknuXTIbh+3wZUsWXCWjdbj2YwpLRT5qABqrQ3K 8gUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfvEWfsiiMI30dcLIQq0bqzzvOthiTxK+VFepnkH845DyIe8Cz 0N0nfLcDikXIcShjjr7/FA/KhycG X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxFV46nADaHXtxjVhlAwqt6euzgcH6qhID8ZRGHIBmIZpuBN5dgaVOfkDtpMb7avjtNk7D0Gg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef83:: with SMTP id d3mr5334170wro.253.1558820018374; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y17sm5452532wrp.70.2019.05.25.14.33.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 May 2019 14:33:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83y32u32eb.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159773 Archived-At: On 25.05.2019 19:49, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Then I already asked those questions. The most important one is what > values can the fetcher variable have, and in what situations (i.e., > triggered by what command(s)) will we see each value. It's akin to asking what values could revert-buffer-function have: different ones. Every command that uses the xref UI is responsible for creating such a function (though most of current ones have a common implementation only parameterized by KIND, see xref--create-fetcher). I have added some more docstrings and a comment, though. Hope they clear up a few things.