From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71466: 30.0.50; Buffer-menu-group-by non-nil resets point when Buffer List is reverted Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:05:14 +0300 Message-ID: References: <86tthzwgsw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86msnkyt7c.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <30404984-e7ac-4f92-a194-06438dbf2d03@gutov.dev> <867cemquey.fsf@gnu.org> <864j9qqpfx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15182"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: 71466@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii , Eshel Yaron Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 19:06:28 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sJcHr-0003eF-SF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:06:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJcHU-00065W-5g; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:06:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJcHP-00064c-7k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJcHO-000153-Vz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJcHR-0006lS-M2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71466 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 71466-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71466.171873032925944 (code B ref 71466); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2024 17:05:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45913 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJcGv-0006kN-4s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:05:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.146]:50725) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJcGs-0006k5-QO for 71466@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:05:27 -0400 Original-Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B7213802A9; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:05:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:05:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1718730318; x=1718816718; bh=yWO+etI2UWuh5MAAKDwCp2kPi3QGQJyxEjGQjzW7xlA=; b= ikvzt6GGzxcOxcKx7k1DyyozqC4QIougt9CgTVnmsa9xV22I3YSlFQD80hZqlfEv wwjXWBo034wxfLZDWXAWwLuG8c6lDx8/VwYczZPqqwDLfTzmMRvK7asmYO3qOVcH ExQB8sLunb4yXOmSbweSVQZ+Rh0+ITsd9w7xbQ26sV4dJPShmy5+wnJyN5SON63c KKVwNaP8eS8oCqqBaIjFdwOAWOJMs3LQRhoxXKEXzLSy5l71+5N+FWIvHGxRVEXo +rWdl7HXPTPJaBq7XtQcp18ztukNjc2tOHccd4KekhJOpDhIKsB32l3D6o1vIlun xfbSV+x67GTPJnfYcSgSTw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1718730318; x= 1718816718; bh=yWO+etI2UWuh5MAAKDwCp2kPi3QGQJyxEjGQjzW7xlA=; b=h ozgmO5jWCI52k5IVB/HA46F/m4x16D5ageQdseyzh1d4bKwotNwwgYcHU07L4E4S mtW4UE/3LzXY1FfAKchF1RvVVJ9QNjAi9zjBwG40S8cSvfbXuwyZFGzREIPob9/Z xViV7aGoWY0yBzfmI0nqvy2xXxmXxrdp47I6eX73+AdgaR1u1w+dRNLI9W+vYL5D VUMCe/coF6DWa4bL0ZgYlio5kp6mrEtqWmE0Clkm9iAHW0sKVc/cB658SAxdPk+P y8jVOB/UtIjDZZ2m2yf+9ohvL4LvCGVUyB+WjPc9QWzWJQIwjjTVNgSLntAxgdFs vm7Qia50bburOS0TZThfQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfedvkedgkedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtvdejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepteduleejgeehtefgheegjeekueehvdevieekueeftddvtdevfefhvdevgedu jeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:05:16 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <864j9qqpfx.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:287446 Archived-At: On 18/06/2024 17:46, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > But the original xref-revert-buffer didn't do all those other things, > did it? So invoking it directly will be more similar to what that did > before. The current xref-revert-buffer already does those things - namely invoke revert-buffer-restore-functions. Even though it's a relatively recent phenomenon. And it makes sense to provide this feature to the users of xref-revert-buffer, so I don't see why not.