From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Heime Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Using conditional in interactive Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:22:30 +0000 Message-ID: <_xNUYtOpBXEf1wLflhP345KZrcoNEnJvtk0-zpRm25Riea3-M-kH9cSKm4UorkXc1uv_HcHE_vm6zeKx6i7lzYC4OQ-aj6w65Bsl2waczcw=@protonmail.com> References: <87o74o4svq.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8770"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Michael Heerdegen , Heime via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor To: Heime Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 16 00:23:20 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1spxeI-00027s-Af for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 00:23:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1spxdf-0001bW-KA; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 18:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1spxde-0001bN-20 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 18:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4325.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1spxdb-00036G-Ta for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 18:22:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1726438954; x=1726698154; bh=TQRdhv/w4orbCtN8kVjOAaNs9alVL5NCXgkvdvX7ZJQ=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=cJ9gr77PbsoodDOdJwcTod+9aKKv/sAWbvrE00X5v0PjDfw80LY3FQQr7MPcE7m3Q Dk59yzxrGCaECNkqobB1BzX2ouc16LGQzXwwDWHB/ymFni1FWhH9NNStTwms4lZ/NT fWCw9RLTIf+Y3iQfP3FQRNQ8S6xAC6CaMdFY0iTdpZl43oAG3XHdEZ8o36etSZNlra TbA2nLgXkf9lEJab5P0afgU0Fr5dmp4h2hQhrnxETjo30A7qHrFu/JiwYsxR5wdQ34 QaJmVZv5c2O98jA6SavGDffdHeX0TrKoPxK2cvSw8E95l7LYCx8Hnw4logIipw24Ub t9Z9bd7Fgmb4w== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 57735886:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: d85f64bb94f4946178753c7557137375f5b097ed Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.25; envelope-from=heimeborgia@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4325.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:147992 Archived-At: On Monday, September 16th, 2024 at 8:50 AM, Heime wrote: > On Monday, September 16th, 2024 at 7:30 AM, Michael Heerdegen michael_hee= rdegen@web.de wrote: >=20 > > Heime heimeborgia@protonmail.com writes: > >=20 > > > (interactive > > >=20 > > > (cond > > > ((eq (nth 0 xiakos-context) 'list) > > >=20 > > > (list > > > (read-string " Search Text: ") > > > (read-number " Number of Context Lines: ") > > > (read-string " Buffer Name: "))) > > >=20 > > > (t > > > "s Search Text: \n\ > > > n Number of Context Lines: \n\ > > > s Buffer Name: ") )) > >=20 > > I already mentioned why you don't want something like this: in > >=20 > > (interactive EXPR) > >=20 > > the return value of the EXPR is used as argument list, not as an > > interactive spec. The EXPR already is the interactive spec. >=20 >=20 > I am not following your argumunt. Would cond not pass the string and > interactive sees it ? If the first condition is satisfied, the interactiv= e > part work correctly, even though there is a cond expression. Yet, the con= d > with a string outputs interprets things completely differently. >=20 > > So to say, you are mixing two unrelated things here. - Michael. >From you have described it, the cond should occur before the interactive clause, ending up with two interactive clause. The one executed would depend on which condition succeeds.