From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default lexical-binding to t Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:09:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <86ttcksgsu.fsf@gnu.org> <86bjysscvr.fsf@gnu.org> <86v7x0w0l6.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86v7wzr2ng.fsf@gnu.org> <86ttcjfovz.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86ed3nqvoe.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UMt6yX/zKstpnR2M" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20559"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Joost Kremers , acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 07 12:10:13 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t90Oy-00059S-Td for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:10:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t90OZ-0004eS-5J; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t90OV-0004dg-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:09:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t90OS-0002S3-TZ; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:09:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=c3Bxqm10+DMo2bwJV+cH6GzqU5WjRinjnjQx9N81jCM=; b=ssEhqe5EjXqIQM47bKJ1uOq39y sItp6t74JeMgrTsV/A97FFkneywSC+dWTQkZPk1RqyXmR0YhNCI4miK5lvjt36vfXpcTm9iPsfpTx LWCGHbFIFlzf7Mx6A+W1OGY8tasVAhgEcatNXPSOpVLWN/buCE7hxc5iPI+G4ag7TmG/CZ7Utckt/ 2MyJLUXImre/L2rG1rlP+e1x6csqHxruiyttrnMQ/goi6jQND5UBjFsXOY9BzpuhzAFUkgnuIzmK8 gF1DiwZl6xEpU849u4KOY4G3go3vV1WWP0CYaJqO65YgwrziTtxIg/Uf1SBi3xD2f+rGRmWUfr4uO IgZMJ+Kg==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t90OF-0008Ih-9r; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:09:27 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86ed3nqvoe.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325221 Archived-At: --UMt6yX/zKstpnR2M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 10:45:21AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Joost Kremers > > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 09:07:28 +0100 > >=20 > > Hi Eli, > > > Are the time, energy, and > > > massive efforts I invested (and am still investing) in bidirectional > > > editing support worth it? I don't know; there are days when I think > > > it was all a terrible waste. > >=20 > > FWIW, I was extremely grateful for that work. At the time bidi support > > became available in Emacs, I needed to work with Arabic texts quite a b= it, > > and it was great that I could do that from the comfort of my favourite > > editor. >=20 > Thanks. But there are other voices in this regard. Count me also on the "thank you!" side. Cheers --=20 t --UMt6yX/zKstpnR2M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZyyf4AAKCRAFyCz1etHa RjYUAJ9GVfiNmMtPOuiRPqVHuE5kY/XLRwCfaczdzOc/rQiO1ZyxtN0s4y7GmNQ= =6G6o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UMt6yX/zKstpnR2M--