From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recursion to iteration macro Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:36:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871q813mgg.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87le69e812.fsf@posteo.net> <87h6gx1cdb.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87edc11baw.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nra9LiKcF3vAG4UB" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21495"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 29 07:38:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rq5sP-0005Kc-G1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:38:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rq5rQ-00055i-54; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rq5rN-00053e-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rq5rK-0002Zs-RS; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:37:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GRc2rNP0mSG+Hn46OsOP6w/pagcm0cyndJc2MaYwVbU=; b=puhcgOAbd2pT8ztcGUzjeRTljb 1Wcs/WGDvhMOI6VXsOmbbtk+QG1n3PMi6sDB4wPKDI0tMxlSdTOYwOmaCVws1yOUYYpIIbQhDyV/z ODUUbgmB9VMg5oyTH9xcjbpTQgUrppO+xYyfM92G72yrbGvwkPyqhps/9ZwjQHpE5E7ni+GWbMqiY qHM0yPfntsgzaLLGJGdRMpLXZIwcuC7excNZTfosBzbE9nj067UhcYZJM6VFDAnQOR6dE5CmHyLo9 pyV3I21o19vbCBpwlJrWbhKjKioeJP7pfGEtIJcAP9K5wYMto0yPsEYJoYykejH8B+MAkrMHaHGnk GCzfPNnQ==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rq5rG-0007ep-3Y; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:36:58 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317373 Archived-At: --Nra9LiKcF3vAG4UB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 06:05:43PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] >=20 > > I wasn't proposing to change Emacs Lisp in this direction. >=20 > Thanks for setting me straight. I didn't perceive my answer as "setting straight". On the contrary, your reply gave me the chance to contextualize what I intended to say, > I couldn't tell, from the messages I happened to see, that such a > change was not the issue at hand. Those messages did not explicitly > say that -- they expected readers to know that from earlier messages > in the thread. I suppose most readers did know, since they aren't so > far behind on mail. I think things are more nuanced. My intention wasn't, but I can't vouch for others in that thread (and that is a Good Thing, diversity is, after all part of the fun). Cheers --=20 t --Nra9LiKcF3vAG4UB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZgZhggAKCRAFyCz1etHa RrszAJoCEhnvtGjtk2+Re2n+UaHOmkNSowCfceDonaUp060KuKwYuiOslV3fFW8= =E/sP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nra9LiKcF3vAG4UB--