From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: is it possible to =?utf-8?B?wqtsb3Nl?= =?utf-8?B?wrs=?= edits when aborting recursive-edits? Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:20:46 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87ply86ham.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9573"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.10+64 (b470a9a) (2023-06-05) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 16 14:59:59 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rPjyw-0002G4-4n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:59:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPjyd-00008t-VP; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:59:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPjyT-00004s-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:59:30 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPjyP-0002UE-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:59:28 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.75.179.243]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000010B87F.0000000065A68B99.00003262; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:58:48 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ply86ham.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -2 X-Spam_score: -0.3 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315018 Archived-At: * Uwe Brauer via "Emacs development discussions. [2024-01-11 08:55]: > > Hi > > I just edited for around 40 min a file, and wanted to commit the > changes. I noticed that I had 2 or three recursive-edits level, most > likely the result of some errors that occurred when I executed some > reftex and latex commands (I do not recall the reasons). > > Be it as it may: I hit C-] as I always do, > committed but then realized that some of my changes were not committed, > indeed they seem to have vanished. I have similar problem. I would like to be able: - to detect pending recursive edits, as not to lose them - to be able to walk over buffers of recursive edits. Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/