From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67483: Wrong warning position given by the byte compiler for a malformed function Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:47:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83wmu38hje.fsf@gnu.org> <83ttp78fvi.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0kb8c89.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39297"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 67483-done@debbugs.gnu.org, acm@muc.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 27 16:49:35 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dra-0009xR-Mr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 16:49:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dr6-0003O8-Kg; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dr4-0003Nf-SH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dqx-0006eg-WD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dr4-0003VZ-58 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:49:02 -0500 Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 67483 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 67483@debbugs.gnu.org, acm@muc.de, acm@muc.de Original-Received: via spool by 67483-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D67483.170110008313152 (code D ref 67483); Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67483-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2023 15:48:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dq6-0003Q3-OQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:48:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.muc.de ([193.149.48.3]:56272) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dq4-0003Oq-TD for 67483-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 27189 invoked by uid 3782); 27 Nov 2023 16:47:48 +0100 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15c1a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.92.26]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 16:47:48 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 636 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Nov 2023 15:47:47 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83r0kb8c89.fsf@gnu.org> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:275135 Archived-At: Hello, Eli. On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 17:09:10 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:01:40 +0000 > > Cc: 67483@debbugs.gnu.org, acm@muc.de > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > > > > Which branch? master or emacs-29? > > > > Both. Probably emacs-28, too. > > > So it isn't a "semi-recent" problem, is it? > > It isn't ten years old, either. I have a fix ready to commit to the > > master branch. > > Seeing as how the bug isn't recently introduced, and isn't a critical > > bug, I'm assuming the patch is not destined for the release branch. > Definitely not. No. I've committed the fix to master, and I'm closing the bug. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).