From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 12:14:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <874jkerxgb.fsf@localhost> <875y4uozgl.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h6oejct1.fsf@localhost> <87wmxanjks.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pm31gg3x.fsf@localhost> <877cp9ne5i.fsf@yahoo.com> <2dece74f-fdd6-9438-b09c-40147719af06@gutov.dev> <87y1hon6hr.fsf@yahoo.com> <93dc23df-036b-381c-681a-7525b350fb3b@gutov.dev> <87ledon5re.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18624"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Ihor Radchenko , Philip Kaludercic , Stefan Kangas , Danny Freeman , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org To: Po Lu , Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 02 14:14:42 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qcPWT-0004g5-Lf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 14:14:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcPW1-00046v-1e; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 08:14:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcPVy-00046m-2d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 08:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.muc.de ([193.149.48.3]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcPVv-00016M-48 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 08:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 32 invoked by uid 3782); 2 Sep 2023 14:14:04 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=muc.de; i=@muc.de; q=dns/txt; s=default; t=1693656844; h=date : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to : from : from; bh=PoIAROyswU44W8awCkiWaNPJCp2rvUtsI5oqwWYr3+k=; b=mR8x4d0MSq81jRrZiUZqcXWhhT42qHNCQLGY7J/YzBXwkb72WxCAaR34qWnyU27AtIqIk 8Csxebn5ucq1wUkXuqI3c+Fzvn7Cn8TBa8Qf6zh99Nf7VMR8GAL2C0v9LGpy3mWt0yHzBYq NMMdMOBCkkrAz0zmPc/uAaS57ICq7xiPs+OEECqWzPAhlEgOqtNPOejmZq/kKhWJmcmIEdc kOQbe+Cr5+ufzbWdDqcDinV3maggUkYqJZMLVQi9I9Y097+VxrFZ0facfSgH8qwr0Pz5QSZ BFNc3Sub3Pfrc9gfi2sh/92pYS+ZdurKFNcO1rkxfNPlT3QWhmptCTYPGTxA== Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15929.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.89.41]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 14:14:02 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 7085 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Sep 2023 12:14:01 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ledon5re.fsf@yahoo.com> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.149.48.3; envelope-from=acm@muc.de; helo=mail.muc.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309886 Archived-At: Hello, Po and Dmitry. On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 20:01:25 +0800, Po Lu wrote: > Dmitry Gutov writes: > > We're talking about people hesitant to insert themselves into > > development conversations, so for proof you're asking for someone to > > do so? > Yes? Where else will any such proof come from? Perhaps it will be > conjured out of thin air to suit the narrative of whoever wishes to > launch into a lengthy, impassioned harangue over at this Speakers' > Corner? This discussion appears to be heading into not nice exchanges. Could we possibly please lower the temperature? Thanks! -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).