From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs segfaults when handling wrong_type_argument backtrace Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 07:51:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2c65531c-2d9c-3c1d-bc2a-5666a7de0a38@sft.lol> <83zg7u6cs3.fsf@gnu.org> <838rfe5y68.fsf@gnu.org> <6178cb5d-e31a-0851-8dbf-cb7be08e8542@sft.lol> <639fba86-b8ec-84e7-78dd-25772c1dad36@sft.lol> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1WUYu8w7UMkfZNfE" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2040"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 01 07:52:20 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1piU9z-0000Jc-T0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 07:52:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piU9I-0004xb-FT; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 01:51:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piU9G-0004xL-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 01:51:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piU9F-0005w3-23 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 01:51:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vuG3HEtzTGknt6gLkqZjoY9ALk9wSTNFHzWYDDOxpgM=; b=cBMai5wfTjla5zXjeEXka1uE+/ uuaZL0SkLoNXkms+MbybagKf3wA7U4zrXzzYwWtPYN7YjuoLnQrUQVNTBp6jsUxbOBOq4ZlMkO1Rk nHElerc1xQ3ayM4cg7N/VZC9XCZWor+C2PN3CIqLfPDw8cUJCJaDtmKtEn0I4nFh7sQ+hvXTHn49b ffmjbyJCBiqjTltmO/JWF+h//OKm5g+GP/ZHO0lqUMZToXwU3HihvsFN5VV5yhqxagY8xY2hqRBVN Erm3LZqScfHG+sMCMWp1kw7TVUYILDEqMEaGNKDNKua7JjVDML9WN+Q2Vgaj4MOedU4YsbV3YxKZn f3pEBwsQ==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1piU9B-0001v4-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 07:51:29 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <639fba86-b8ec-84e7-78dd-25772c1dad36@sft.lol> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304959 Archived-At: --1WUYu8w7UMkfZNfE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 09:01:04PM +0200, Jonas Jelten wrote: > On 2023-03-30 20:51, Andrea Corallo wrote: > > Jonas Jelten writes: > > > After clearing the cache it seems to work, thanks, that was easy. > > > I assumed that changes in the abi would result in a version bump :) > >=20 > > It results in Emacs changing the directory name of the eln under > > eln-cache, this way Emacs would discard all the other elns and produce > > new ones. Just curious: what happens with the old directories? Cheers --=20 t --1WUYu8w7UMkfZNfE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZCfGWgAKCRAFyCz1etHa Ruv1AJwOECKWu1syilgyyeTLdTTTaX6TOwCeMKVtD/aDFaNIYxh19GQCfcSPu4U= =uNUT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1WUYu8w7UMkfZNfE--