From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61962: 30.0.50; New trouble with symbols with positions Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 18:39:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87o7p8v6ak.fsf@web.de> <83ilfga322.fsf@gnu.org> <877cvvqj5v.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21068"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , Eli Zaretskii , 61962@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 05 19:40:27 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pYtHW-0005If-O6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2023 19:40:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pYtHC-0002Xf-Li; Sun, 05 Mar 2023 13:40:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pYtH8-0002XP-IX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2023 13:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pYtH8-000344-8b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2023 13:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pYtH7-0000K0-TG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2023 13:40:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61962 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61962-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61962.16780415541175 (code B ref 61962); Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2023 18:39:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pYtGM-0000It-7x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2023 13:39:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mx3.muc.de ([193.149.48.5]:13934) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pYtGK-0000If-4Q for 61962@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2023 13:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 69378 invoked by uid 3782); 5 Mar 2023 19:39:06 +0100 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pd953abc0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.83.171.192]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Mar 2023 19:39:05 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 19202 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Mar 2023 18:39:05 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877cvvqj5v.fsf@web.de> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:257358 Archived-At: Hello, Michael. On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 17:04:12 +0100, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Mattias Engdegård writes: > > That would very likely be fcf2f7aead. > When this issue is not easy to fix, .... I will look into this in the next day or two. > .... maybe consider to revert that commit for now (inexact compiler > warning positions are less problematic than breaking Elisp code). I disagree with your concept here. Warning positions are not accurate or inaccurate (they cannot be +- 2%, for example), they are either correct or they are wrong. A lot of effort was put into making them correct, although it is clear from this bug that that project is as yet incomplete. Please don't revert that commit from 2023-02-17. I will look into this and try to fix the bug properly. > Michael. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).