From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Summary by thread in rmail Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:29:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <831qrlsd5v.fsf@gnu.org> <87lept76z0.fsf@autistici.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fGHJbfjLZkKYTud9" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14387"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 09:30:58 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ogLLO-0003ap-HW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 09:30:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogLLN-0003yt-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 03:30:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogLJs-00036J-7m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 03:29:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:44080) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogLJq-0004jH-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 03:29:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NFAhZCKTUxuAhOnT0CT/6b5pBTrv+dtrv3qNDJnZXhU=; b=uKYJSuC+v0dnFy9Qd/DtxX5CLk eVi1dNaXx4Nmr9/9gf8XziThpe2GUMRHAY2VCwSYfgKOtq8exnjQ1cZjRT4JszE7ecxChGCgT75uk 6sUnXHinIVL2LXRmSuAB10yH8WxsVgT5hd/wn1fPmLZ71pOXxFSXgDRWMvMZqEmL0wYE61K67pk2w YiZ0vvtvBbdgq9JuLJ2y3fiLcyerQMiBPLVCw2lSke40k/pJRALygFdWCYJj0/I0RPxyfVLWgnO8U UrbyztQKxo2UYEwRo9q12ZNEAWqa2zexxzr76W5wFpJXrCmEFC8+AsJ1QOaMqzYwwGFvg2t7hr9yq iSxrjPLg==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ogLJn-00070e-3d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 09:29:19 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lept76z0.fsf@autistici.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297074 Archived-At: --fGHJbfjLZkKYTud9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 09:21:23AM +0200, Andrea Monaco wrote: >=20 > > Great, but you are aware of Emacs Gnus? >=20 > Yes, but I prefer rmail, because I find the interface clearer. >=20 >=20 > > IOW, what is the use case for this new command that the existing > > C-M-t doesn't support? >=20 > That seems obvious to me. C-M-t only shows a single thread, while my > patch shows all mail this way. This is useful to me, and is a common > feature among mail clients. I think Gnome Evolution shows mail by > thread by default. Still a pity that it guesses its threads by Subject: instead of using In-Reply-To: and References: In this way not better than the Microsoft "products" :-( Cheers --=20 t --fGHJbfjLZkKYTud9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYz6DyAAKCRAFyCz1etHa Rnu1AJ9qIFiSZbygtezvmY0LhnIdSt/BogCeI7+AxoU7Jshopccm5EjKeTMwitc= =Didb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fGHJbfjLZkKYTud9--