From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56305: 29.0.50; 'yes-or-no-p' deselects minibuffer frame Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:54:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83bku69nn2.fsf@gnu.org> <83iloc8yzs.fsf@gnu.org> <83h73w8f7i.fsf@gnu.org> <83zghn7ckd.fsf@gnu.org> <83zghm5evt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29126"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 56305@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 17:55:53 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o9Tr6-0007Lk-Iy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 17:55:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49898 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9Tr5-0004zU-2q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9TqJ-0004y3-HT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9TqH-0003HH-Tm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9TqH-0000q4-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 15:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56305 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56305-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56305.16572092913204 (code B ref 56305); Thu, 07 Jul 2022 15:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56305) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2022 15:54:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57679 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9Tq7-0000pc-0d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:16547 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9Tq5-0000pP-Mq for 56305@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 77873 invoked by uid 3782); 7 Jul 2022 15:54:43 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15b63.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.91.99]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 17:54:42 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 16412 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Jul 2022 15:54:41 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83zghm5evt.fsf@gnu.org> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:236388 Archived-At: Hello, Eli. On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 20:29:10 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 17:04:40 +0000 > > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 56305@debbugs.gnu.org, > > acm@muc.de > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > > Do you have a suggestion for a change there to improve the behavior? > > I do now. I think we should expunge the entire section of code. > I'm okay with doing that on master, .... OK, I've committed that patch to master, removing that section of code. > .... but who will tell us what will that do for Emacs 28? I hoped to > be able to release Emacs 28.2 soon-ish, so I don't want to wait for > this change to collect enough trust so that we could cherry-pick it. > I guess that means Emacs 28.2 will have this issue unresolved, unless > someone comes up with some ideas. The situation on the release branch is still fluid. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).