From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55414: 29.0.50; Byte compilation error for the modus-themes Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 13:42:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7D261135-FB1A-4DF7-9304-DB303949BBA0@acm.org> <87ilpr9svn.fsf@gnus.org> <87r14fi7i9.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87mtf38dem.fsf@gnus.org> <87leun6vl2.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38726"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Protesilaos Stavrou , 55414@debbugs.gnu.org, Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , Stefan Monnier , acm@muc.de, Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 27 15:43:34 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nuaFZ-0009ty-Nt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 May 2022 15:43:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38436 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nuaFY-0004at-Cc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 May 2022 09:43:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nuaF4-0004a9-Uh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2022 09:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nuaF4-0006ND-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2022 09:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nuaF4-0002qD-F5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2022 09:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 13:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55414 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 55414-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55414.165365894310869 (code B ref 55414); Fri, 27 May 2022 13:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55414) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2022 13:42:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nuaER-0002pF-DV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2022 09:42:23 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:61156 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nuaEL-0002oy-UJ for 55414@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2022 09:42:22 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 39709 invoked by uid 3782); 27 May 2022 13:42:11 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15b6f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.91.111]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2022 15:42:11 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3702 invoked by uid 1000); 27 May 2022 13:42:10 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87leun6vl2.fsf@gnus.org> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:233200 Archived-At: Hello, Lars. On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 13:52:57 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Alan Mackenzie writes: > >> Thanks, I'm closing this bug report, then. > > Please don't do that yet. The bug is not yet resolved. If you have > > already done this, do you mind if I reopen it? > No problem, but it's fine to continue discussion in a closed bug > report -- debbugs doesn't care. I'm unhappy about you stating falsehoods on this list, and then ignoring me when I draw your attention to this. You have twice falsely stated that byte-compile--first-symbol-with-pos was responsible for Prot's stack overflow. The first time, on 2022-05-15 was a mistake, and I corrected you. The second time, yesterday was .... what? Why did you ignore me drawing your attention to this today? Why did you repeat this falsehood yesterday? Why did you close the bug on the basis of this falsehood? Or, have I misunderstood something? Please deal with all the points in this post. > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).