From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "tomas@tuxteam.de" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Bigger fringe bitmaps Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:19:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83mthpgfao.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfrhklob.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83lex9gc3y.fsf@gnu.org> <87o824lwy7.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83k0cshh43.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsngl0ue.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83ee2zhjai.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hCr6xt5XOBzH1BoA" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39682"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 18 18:20:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nVGHE-000ABw-Bt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:20:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54862 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nVGHD-0003s8-1O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:20:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nVGGB-0002UG-NM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:19:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:36232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nVGG9-00083y-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:19:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3vOdTxq0yl8FHb1JzqQv6Vzzi3ApQREv1zekXdLmF8s=; b=rlHLaUk4xxfvN8gn+Zn1JekOIo yB0DCNLB44RmH0xD/cMEWUd6I6rdj1rpQezWhUBoxo2eGzhv9BWFUh+O2YKN05wnT3uexXn17EHlq CkZ3Q4nj6rjNpIiT0TGxoVOUeffifi57MfkW3QAap46okbL8v86f2ZRdDvzi+S/wqYgRknACRprIL i+pRvH17pOBRVau+XpfkhrRLi8foMcwz/Y7IbMoaKP44WlljqEnVKvjXk3sTp15h41ozjgCMihC+K H8qA/fRwpwM9k70rkruwsCzOiQQUktNC/Ph9Ke5pdceZTDQMSrRUNAmPESurXghbsU5qHJ18nxor8 0sjZkAZQ==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nVGG6-0007z0-2v; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:19:26 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287295 Archived-At: --hCr6xt5XOBzH1BoA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 04:08:33PM +0000, Drew Adams wrote: > > > > How many hours will pass before someone requests a > > > > capability to use more than just a single column? > > > > > > Indeed. To get the ball rolling, let me be the first > > > to request the capability to use an irrational number > > > of columns - PI columns, for instance. PI seems like > > > a nice round number... > >=20 > > Why not go straight to a Chaitin number? There should > > be plenty of those! > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaitin%27s_constant >=20 > Can't explain my preference rationally; it's irrational. OTOH it might take me too long to explain my preference. But then, it might not. Cheers --=20 t --hCr6xt5XOBzH1BoA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYjS/FgAKCRAFyCz1etHa RnYuAJ934uCt+FaIEd5tyNY01KhJOVvTsgCdH7BC2BJaYhqj3ALh8EY4SVtgbRg= =FcoO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hCr6xt5XOBzH1BoA--