From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54079: 29.0.50; Method dispatching eratically fails Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 19:07:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87bkz113hz.fsf@web.de> <87mtik3l54.fsf@web.de> <87ilt6bgnt.fsf@web.de> <87sfsapgv0.fsf@web.de> <87o82ypfxz.fsf@web.de> <875youbhbu.fsf@web.de> <83ilssgt34.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30082"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, larsi@gnus.org, 54079@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 05 20:08:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nQZlB-0007d3-Pq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 20:08:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38612 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nQZlA-0006ML-7S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 14:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nQZl4-0006Lx-SP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 14:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55197) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nQZl4-0001CN-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 14:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nQZl4-0008Dd-4w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 14:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 19:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54079 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54079-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54079.164650727431579 (code B ref 54079); Sat, 05 Mar 2022 19:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2022 19:07:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nQZkw-0008DH-3y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 14:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:53511 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nQZku-0008D2-1u for 54079@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 14:07:52 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 65351 invoked by uid 3782); 5 Mar 2022 19:07:46 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p2e5d5265.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.93.82.101]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 20:07:45 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 6827 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Mar 2022 19:07:45 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83ilssgt34.fsf@gnu.org> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228040 Archived-At: Hello, Eli. On Sat, Mar 05, 2022 at 20:19:43 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 16:37:16 +0000 > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > Cc: acm@muc.de, 54079@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > > > > CHECK_SYMBOL (symbol); > > + /* If we're in a byte compilation, ensure the definition's symbols > > + are stripped of their positions. */ > > + if (symbols_with_pos_enabled > > + && SYMBOL_WITH_POS_P (symbol) > > + && Ffboundp (Qbyte_run_strip_symbol_positions)) > > + call1 (Qbyte_run_strip_symbol_positions, definition); > The first two conditions should be in reverse order, for speedier > code, shouldn't they? Maybe. A slight slowdown would happen if the first condition was true whilst the second was not. Yes, that could happen whilst `require'ing a ..elc file, which will happen regularly. I'll swap them around. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).