From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: with-pgtk: C-; turns into plain ';' Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:33:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Vat8dEvx/wD0dVuB" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34987"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 15 13:35:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJx3C-0008jP-0i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:35:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58564 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJx3A-0006wJ-J6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:35:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJx1j-0006FC-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:33:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:52136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJx1h-0005gA-79 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:33:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6Px9Fjzq7oP8bd8e8E9vGq/LoCMOmKDubdRzyYhOGmM=; b=SjWBFVE8ydeutacoInCRDXqxEP R3li/OsGQW+deTMc+Y8qzUuwX1Vcns3Aa9VXoG6GL4Qd6RoMyNTyM5JmKK+TPhMp5hTvziWQ3N12b xkdAMKzrIg5iAxRT+GGjL0608EI0W5j/IUTcWi0cOvklXfaVNQieWHRwJBLhiyWPhLCEIn/EhojjR h5KROF0j7OpTsNQ1zNDo5Pv3OD0TgYe8T0HHUFudwlPFGvye7lQ1HSfs3BWyEp0hgAdYpQ+pD7ZDy KWEFoWQXVjW2g/875a+TLmIo5Zwt+2UlJiFMqHaQ+XNPC4jDI9zXgHTfKoF12mmCnXyYxBb+duKrn BJ6hbsOQ==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJx1e-0004vv-Gw; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:33:46 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286318 Archived-At: --Vat8dEvx/wD0dVuB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:56:40AM +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hello, Tomas. >=20 > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 07:36:21 +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > > Note that TTYs have no way to represent C-; and friends. >=20 > But they do. It just takes a bit of work. loadkeys is your friend. > I've had C-; on my Linux console for over 20 years, now. As well as > loadkeys, you need to set up Emacs with stuff in the function-key-map to > handle the modified keys. It works well. OK, OK. I should have added "often" :-) Usually it's me the one who says "all generalizations suck". Thanks for setting me straight. Still, and returning to the OP, the described behaviour is at least a kind of hint: I'd check whether C-c and C-x works or not, to bisect the issue at that point. Cheers --=20 t --Vat8dEvx/wD0dVuB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYgudpAAKCRAFyCz1etHa RuhtAJ4+FHdI1EI9nhOxI1fm5xLPh8uYPgCfZnYBtAgLm1ZV09QAQBSPYwzwmUo= =+ea3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Vat8dEvx/wD0dVuB--