From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recent change to yanking behavior of the clipboard Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 07:57:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87leynz8th.fsf@gnus.org> <87leynjrpv.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h79bz6kb.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6f3jq02.fsf@yahoo.com> <87mtj3xqx1.fsf@gnus.org> <176C779C-0332-42D2-858D-22FB15F28E73@yahoo.com> <871r0fjhwg.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tTZ4n64zZOUM32P5" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16653"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 07 08:10:56 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGyAq-00047f-4L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 08:10:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52800 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGyAo-0007wJ-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 02:10:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGxyu-0004ui-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 01:58:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:51748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGxyS-0002YD-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 01:58:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xM3OklvtGXvsgBLqiI9QUAjPz9jisY2kELnBslJmgm4=; b=p9E4glYl3M2+oB8xVDtg4EHW5t V/S0jTaNiawjHldgHAxIxI4PW7DkVN1AcELylzjTctQh9Cofwbw/DyKroZWy+2XlKXk7u/Dz17gZR tkcA0eQmOHlVVDkYAQOkc9QZvdUbhw3kMDvKLEO8iRy5VhMxtaxK4PzuzBORonQLXWv759GQBLGfD /yJlhWCqJaSSa23IQZ+HszFpfGp7uO7ZjdaHXi3IasOwlHCEMthqVtDoIqiQBKMor/Y+1Xh9O6nj8 fXUs/6pTVlwusfHaSbo+G4uQ+Wz3QUv5AkjaWO6MHYL7BDkKi659cJ2aVOKDS/OIh0rgI5OBVoQwg a28JYeXg==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nGxyA-00022q-Fq; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 07:57:50 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871r0fjhwg.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286023 Archived-At: --tTZ4n64zZOUM32P5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 02:43:43PM +0800, Po Lu wrote: > writes: >=20 > >> I was trying to discourage users from enabling > >> `select-enable-primary', which Lars disagreed with. It was turned > >> off by default in Emacs 21, where Emacs switched to the now-standard > >> behaviour by default. >=20 > > One of those default discussions, sigh :) >=20 > None of us are questioning the default here, I was simply trying to > discourage people from doing that. I see. I do understand your points, mind you. Still... > If someone still wants to turn it on, nothing stops him from doing so. =2E.. I'm glad I can do that. > However, the behaviour of his desktop will become undefined, and other > programs will stop working correctly. I choose wisely. And hate those outliers I /have/ to use nevertheless. Yes, I'm weird :-) Thanks --=20 --tTZ4n64zZOUM32P5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYgDC5wAKCRAFyCz1etHa RsMPAJsEYLnXZlrhV795LdrfouwRggowpACfV77a/TZCXesJXym4q+/LyXahZ9I= =7CeR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tTZ4n64zZOUM32P5--