From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem with some new emoji in Emacs Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 10:50:11 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <83o86nx13c.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf1rw8ga.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10401"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.7+183 (3d24855) (2021-05-28) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 14 08:54:34 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mmALR-0002aE-NI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 08:54:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52782 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmALQ-00080x-HE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 02:54:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmAJw-0006hl-9Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 02:53:01 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:49571) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmAJu-00086O-1c; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 02:52:59 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.75.188.219]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 0000000000031ECB.000000006190C057.00006BF8; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 00:52:54 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83lf1rw8ga.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279393 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2021-11-14 09:36]: > > Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 23:49:35 +0300 > > From: Jean Louis > > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > When I use describe-char I can see that ✔ and ✔️ are same now on my > > screen but they don't activate > > What do you mean by "don't activate"? They don't show up, even those I look now above don't show up same, left one is smaller check mark, right one is emojified. This has been explained in bug report that there is char FE0F after ✔ and that is where it becomes recognized and emojified ✔ and ✔️ are not same as I have done C-x 8 RET FE0F right after ✔ and have understood how and why it works. > That's what should happen: the U+FE0F VARIATION SELECTOR 16 character > requests the preceding character to be displayed as Emoji. So what > you see is Emacs 28 and later behaving as designed, and as the Unicode > Standard says it should behave. Thanks! 👏 Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/