From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Org to Markdown programmatically Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 23:11:15 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87a6paj2e2.fsf@zoho.eu> <87bl9q95e3.fsf@yandex.com> <8735v2fdtg.fsf@zoho.eu> <87tunhbq9i.fsf@zoho.eu> <87sg318a6o.fsf@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25974"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 05 22:14:23 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leNuY-0006aq-Ss for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 22:14:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leNuX-0002vL-Tk for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:14:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leNuB-0002u4-AG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:13:59 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:37305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leNu9-0002sU-6m for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:13:59 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:197.239.6.254]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 00000000000ABF27.000000006092FC82.000077CE; Wed, 05 May 2021 13:13:53 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sg318a6o.fsf@zoho.eu> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:129498 Archived-At: * Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor [2021-05-05 18:47]: > >> Anyway found lots of small mistakes that I corrected. I run > >> it on all my blog post pages - and this article by far > >> scored the highest, 79% > >> > >> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/blog/box-10/marco-antonio-barrera.html > > > > Scored for which term? > > Overall score. Overall score of how, what? Where? > >>> (let ((my-keywords '("TODO" hi-yellow > >>> "DONE" hi-green > >>> "URGENT" hi-red-b))) > >>> (while my-keywords > >>> (let ((keyword (pop my-keywords)) > >>> (highlight (pop my-keywords))) > >>> (highlight-regexp keyword highlight))))) > >> > >> Hahaha, creative! :) > >> > >> But go get yourself a proper loop, will you :) > > > > For me, proper loops in Emacs Lisp are `while' and mapping > > functions. It gives me more clarity due to old habbits. > > `while' is proper but not here as you `pop' twice in the body > when you can iterate that. I like popping. I don't know why would the word "iterate" not relate to `while' here. Show me how would you iterate on the above function. When there are 2 elements to take out of the list and do something with it, I like to pop it twice. Very handy, and why not. Imagine if there are 3... popping thrice is so much easier than thinking of what... I have no idea. > Also my-keywords ... that name, also how it mixes two things, > plus insists on a certain order without enforcing it. You give me too much thinking here, more than it was necessary for the function to work. > Ever heard that once you pop you can't stop? That's what's going to > happen, I'm afraid. Since I have started changing `dolist' to `while' that is what happened, there is often pop. > > `dolist' and `dotimes', or cl-loop, I will never use in > > Emacs Lisp. I may use it in Common Lisp. > > Sorry, but your boycott notwithstanding, they are still Elisp > functions, so actually you can't use them in CL :P Maybe I am just bored. `while' loops seem to me easier understandable, visible. Times change. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/ https://rms-support-letter.github.io/