From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 289000e: Merge branch 'feature/native-comp' into trunk Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:32:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83v989jmuc.fsf@gnu.org> <83czuhjh0r.fsf@gnu.org> <83bla1jd0w.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2d5hsaq.fsf@gnu.org> <8335vah9x4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6912"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 28 14:38:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lbjS9-0001hC-DP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:38:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48652 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbjS8-0005W1-G4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbjMw-0001FT-O3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:32:42 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:53836 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbjMs-0007XO-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:32:41 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 14714 invoked by uid 3782); 28 Apr 2021 12:32:34 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15c50.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.92.80]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:32:34 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 10380 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Apr 2021 12:32:34 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8335vah9x4.fsf@gnu.org> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.149.48.1; envelope-from=acm@muc.de; helo=mail.muc.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268567 Archived-At: Hello, Eli. On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 15:26:47 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:34:13 +0000 > > Cc: akrl@sdf.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > The timings on src/minibuf.c were: > > (i) .elc files: 6.31s. > > (ii) .eln files: 5.44s. > > , which is around a 13% speed up. > Was Emacs built with or without optimizations? Optimised builds in both cases. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).