From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [solved]: Re: Finding last *Async Shell Command* buffer? Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 02:29:25 +0300 Message-ID: References: <8335wiqrek.fsf@gnu.org> <831rc2qi35.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuoyp2t1.fsf@gnu.org> <83sg4ioztv.fsf@gnu.org> <875z1dh8ur.fsf@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 27 00:34:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lPvyi-0001VS-Sn for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 00:34:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33782 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPvyh-0000kp-Ta for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:34:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPvx1-0000N7-SL for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:52705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPvx0-0004Sb-Fr for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.58]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000001E1C3.00000000605E6F33.000041E1; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:33:06 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875z1dh8ur.fsf@zoho.eu> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:128688 Archived-At: * Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor [2021-03-27 01:16]: > Jean Louis wrote: > > >> Why do you need to understand it? Isn't it clear, up front, > >> that changing some old behavior runs a clear risk of > >> breaking someone's habits or code that relies on > >> that behavior? > > > > OK that is what you mean. Now is clear, of course. > > If you write the new code all modular and neat it shouldn't > brake anything, especially nothing that's sound - neat and > modular itself. > > If it does, either the new thing is bad or the previous stuff > wasn't that neat or modular, come to think of it. Maybe yes, maybe no, but what matters is that of today works well and I can browse those active buffers with a key. In general what matters personally is if it is useful and works. Yet another opportunist.